Town Square

Post a New Topic

A Tale of Three Cities and their utilization of citizen volunteers in response to the Covid 19 Pandemic

Original post made by Peter Carpenter, Menlo Park: Park Forest, on Apr 26, 2020

Here is what the City of Palo Alto did over a month ago:


City of Palo Alto Emergency Services Volunteer Activation Order 20200317-1

The City of Palo Alto is activating the ESV program in response to the COVID-19 emergency. A state of emergency has been issued at the National, State, County, and City level and extraordinary measures have been enacted to slow the spread of the coronavirus.

The intent of this activation is to promote public safety in our neighborhoods and to encourage a sense of normalcy in our community.

Actions all ESV Members should take:
1. Be visible in your neighborhoods. “Eyes and Ears”. Take periodic walks and wear your vest and hat and carry your City issued ESV ID Card. The current shelter in place order allows outside activity as long as you maintain a healthy distance from others – at least 6 feet.

2. Stay “in the loop”. Be aware of what is happening locally.
• Look for and read OES updates (via Veoci),
• Follow the City’s Coronavirus daily updates
• Point neighbors to the City’s Coronavirus website.
New features are being added weekly – Community Support, and Support Local Businesses
• Read and listen to trusted sources of information.

3. Check on your neighbors. On a routine basis communicate with your neighbors. Pass along information you receive from OES or help stop rumors.
• Send questions to the City’s Call-Center: 650-272-3181
• Provide electronic or hard copy public safety materials.
o The current Coronavirus flyer:
o Help / OK signs:
o Many others, ask us about them

4. Update/Create Contact Lists. If you already have contact lists via email, text, online – use those to make sure your neighbors are well. If you don’t, now is a good time to start. Remember that some members of our community may be at more risk with the imposed social isolation and lack of basic supplies.

5. Remember, solve problems at the lowest level. Some community resources are available:See:
• Your closest resource is your best resource.
• Ask for help when you don’t have a local solution. Reach out for assistance if you need it. Contact your fellow BPCs, NPC, or OES.
If you have questions, work through your NPCs - follow the chain of command please.

Throughout this situation – have positive intentions, be respectful, and do no harm. Thanks for all you are doing and will do to assist our community.
Nathan Rainey
Emergency Services Coordinator

The Town of Atherton also activated their Atherton Disaster Assistance and Preparedness Team with a similar mission at the same time.

The citizen volunteers who Palo Alto and Atherton have activated include both individuals who are CERT trained and many who are not because these jurisdiction realize that the Covid 19 Pandemic requires very different skill sets than do other types of disasters. These Emergency Service Volunteers (ESV) are not roaming the streets, knocking on doors or doing search and rescue but rather bringing their neighborhoods closer together. And they are an incredible force multiplier for their very resource constrained local governments. As Palo Alto states ""The City needs information from the neighborhoods to know the big picture and focus on getting resources to where the need is greatest.”

In contrast the City of Menlo Park has refused to use its citizen volunteers.
I will leave it to our elected City Council to explain why.

Since the City of Menlo Park has designated citizens volunteers as YOYOs (You are On Your Own) some of us have decided to follow these Palo Alto instructions:

WHEN AND HOW TO ACTIVATE
• Self activate if the situation is known to you (you see, feel, hear, smell, etc.) without outside advice and affects your immediate area or neighborhood.

The Covid Pandemic is certainly known to us and it certainly affects our immediate neighborhoods.

Given this my Park Forest Plus neighborhood has Self Activated and we are in operation.

We are fully organized with an Area Preparedness Coordinator, three Neighborhood Preparedness Coordinators and 8 Block Preparedness Coordinators. Some are CERT trained but most are just very smart capable citizens. We have inventoried every residence in our neighborhood, have our own web site (https://www.parkforestplus.com), do continual check-ins, share scarce resources, help anyone who needs help and are bringing our neighborhood together as it has never been before. We haven’t seen a police cruiser in our neighborhood for over a month - but that is fine because we know that it does not take a badge and a gun to take care of our neighbors. And you do not need to be a CERT to be an impactful Emergency Service Volunteer in the age of Covid 19.

I am aware that other Menlo Park neighborhoods have also Self Activated.

Join us, you CAN make a difference. You do NOT need anybody’s permission.

Peter Carpenter
MPFPD CERT
Founding member of Atherton’s ADAPT
A currently Activated Palo Alto CERT
Park Forest Plus Block Preparedness Coordinator

" Life isn’t easy or simple, but it’s doable
Some people say life is easy. It’s not. Others say it’s simple. It’s not. Life is hard and confusing. But it’s doable. We can figure it out. We just have a way of overthinking it. Sometimes the hardest thing we do is cutting out all the nonsense and getting back to what’s possible.”



Ps. In an attempt to demonstrate his expert knowledge of the Incident Command System the Menlo Pak Police Chief has repeatedly stated that the ICS began as a result of the Oakland Fire. He was 20 years off - hopefully it won't take 20 years for Menlo Park to catch up with Palo Alto and Atherton in the wise use of volunteers.

The Incident Command System began LONG before the Oakland Fire - I know because when I was a US Forest Service Smokejumper 1958-1961 we were already utilizing the early versions of it in Region 5. Every fire had an Incident Commander and that Commander changed as a particular fire grew larger and more resources were assigned. We lived ICS every day.


"FIRST THERE WAS FIRE: THE 1970 FIRE SEASON AND THE BEGINNING OF FIRESCOPE

ICS was developed in the 1970s by an interagency group in Southern California called FIRESCOPE. FIRESCOPE stood for Firefighting Resources of Southern California Organized for Potential Emergencies and they set out to develop two interrelated, yet independent, systems for managing wildland fire. Those two systems were the:

Multiagency Coordination System (MACS)
Incident Command System (ICS)
The impetus for the development of these systems was the disastrous and devastating 1970 fire season in Southern California. At the time, the sky was full of giant smoke columns and fire apparatus were passing each other on their way to incidents, with some going north as others headed south. Individual Command Posts and fire camps were established by multiple agencies for the same incident. Response resource availabilities reached critically low levels. The number of fires burning at the same time taxed the organizational capability to protect lives, property, and the environment, especially where wilderness bordered urban communities, creating a dangerous wildland-urban interface. These fires, over 13 days, resulted in 16 deaths, 700+ destroyed structures, more than 500,000 acres burned, and over $234 million in damage.

As part of the after-action review, the U.S. Forest Service, with their partner response agencies in Southern California, examined the incident management efforts. They discovered the following issues:

At the incident or field level, there was confusion derived from different terminology, organizational structure, and operating procedures between the various response agencies.
Above the incident or field level at the agency or coordination level, the mechanisms to coordinate and handle competing resource demands and to establish consistent resource priorities was inadequate.
Based on the devastating fire season of 1970 and these findings, Congress allocated $900,000 to the U.S. Forest Service to develop a system to improve the capabilities of wildland fire response agencies to effectively coordinate multiagency, multijurisdictional response. Specifically, they were to “make a quantum jump in the capabilities of Southern California wildland fire protection agencies to effectively coordinate interagency action and to allocate suppression resources in dynamic, multiple fire situations” (FIRESCOPE Program Charter, 1973). The Congressional funding was used to establish a Research, Development, and Application (RD&A) program at the Riverside Fire Laboratory in Riverside, CA which eventually became known as FIRESCOPE.

It should be noted that at the beginning of this work, despite the recognition that there were incident or field level shortfalls in organization and terminology, there was no mention of the need to develop an on the ground incident management system like ICS. Most of the efforts were focused on the multiagency coordination challenges above the incident or field level. It wasn’t until 1972 when FIRESCOPE was formed that this need was recognized and the concept of ICS was first discussed."

Comments (5)

Posted by microbarny
a resident of Menlo Park: Park Forest
on Apr 27, 2020 at 10:55 pm

Most good ideas take some time to develop...granted. That is what happened in Atherton and Palo Alto with their emergency service volunteer programs. The key that spurred and sped up their development, beyond the persistence of a few noble volunteer leaders, was a receptive City government coming to the table to support, promote and legitimize the volunteer effort. While volunteer leaders in Menlo Park have tried organizing and mobilizing over the years, only a few Menlo Park neighborhoods actually have a developed ESV network. Why is that? In my view, there has been insufficient support by Menlo Park Council Members, City Managers and Police brass over the years.

One would hope that in an emergency like this that the need would be clear and the City would be more than interested in building out a neighborhood volunteer network throughout Menlo Park. For the first time in years, there is strong cohesive movement by residents in Menlo Park to organize teams to help their neighbors. Indeed, an umbrella citizen's group called MPC Ready has been created and is helping recruit ESV members and create communication channels across the City's neighborhoods. But with very minimal Menlo Park City support to date, this effort is taking too much time. We are missing an opportunity to really ramp up a network when many are keen to help and get involved. And in an emergency like this, there isn't any time to waste.

Menlo Park City officials, if not now, when? When will you support an emergency volunteer infrastructure that can be called upon for help in a variety of emergencies (e.g., an earthquake) should they occur? If it can be done in other communities, it can be done in Menlo Park. And if this volunteer effort is officially supported by City governments in other neighboring communities, it can be supported in Menlo Park. Unfortunately, in Menlo Park, our City leaders haven't ever really valued this important effort in the past and, even more unfortunately, the City continues to barely acknowledge it, let alone sanction it, even now - in the midst of a critical event when eyes, ears and a neighborly helping hand can be especially valuable.


Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Menlo Park: Park Forest
on Apr 28, 2020 at 9:36 am

Why is the City of Menlo Park not following the Best Practices of its neighboring communities?

Both Palo Alto and Atherton have an extensive network of FREE Emergency Service Volunteers making sure that their neighbors are ok and providing them with assistance.

Menlo Park, even though it is projecting a huge budget deficit, is instead using a very few PAID staff to do welfare checks for a much smaller number of its citizens:

""Community members who would like to refer a vulnerable neighbor, or family members wanting to sign up a loved one, can request a wellness check online. City staff, who are background checked and supervised, will be able to connect those referred with various City, county, and nonprofit resources available to them and will check on them weekly until the stay-at-home order is lifted." "

If Menlo Park staff were called upon to do welfare checks for the same percentage of its citizens as Palo Alto and Atherton are doing with their ESV's the Menlo Park staff system would collapse.

So what is the difference? Palo Alto and Atherton local governments are Citizens Centric while Menlo Park's government is Staff Centric.


Posted by Lynne Bramlett
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Apr 30, 2020 at 5:32 pm

It's considered a municipal best practice to establish a trained and ready, volunteer-based group that helps to prepare residents (and neighborhoods) to be self-sufficient following a major disaster. On any given day, Menlo Park has very few first responders present given our City's population and the number of “day workers” coming in to work at Facebook, etc. On any given day, the numbers present in Menlo Park can double our official population which is likely to hit 45,000 in the 2020 Census.

Few first responders live in Menlo Park or nearby. With the major roads, and the airports possibly closed following a major earthquake, additional help might not arrive for 7-14 days or more! The First Responders present will also be working off their designated priority lists and most residential neighborhoods are not top priority!

This is why it is so critical that households are prepared to be self-sufficient, and then help their neighbors, until the first responders can arrive. Organized neighborhoods can also deter potential looters. Looting often starts within 30 minutes of a major disaster. Organized neighborhoods also help with reconnaissance and then in sending information to the overall Incident Commander via a chain of Block, Neighborhood and Area Coordinators. We can let the Incident Commander know when a neighborhood is safe and self-sufficient. That way, the first responders can help neighborhoods in greater need.

The MPC Ready Organization launched January 25, 2020 with the participation and support of Mayor Cecilia Taylor. There had been a prior organization that fizzled out over time, mostly due to a lack of official support and volunteer burn-out at the Herculean effort. We don't want this to happen again!
Although a new organization, the COVID-19 Emergency enabled MPC Ready to relatively quickly recruit, Block, Neighborhood and Area Coordinators. We now have about 300 volunteers, but we need about 1000 more. Neighbors are meeting neighbors through the Block Coordination effort and Block Coordinators are conducting welfare checks, and providing support, and laying the foundation for Phase II of MPC Ready. As soon as we can, MPC Ready wants to help neighborhoods with proactive readiness for other major disasters such as a major earthquake, flood or canopy fire. You can sign up to be a Block Coordinator at www.mpcready.org.

MPC Ready has had some direct support from the City of Menlo Park via a designated Liaison during the COVID-19 emergency. Mayor Taylor and Police Chief Bertini also spoke at the most recent community meeting (April 25, 2020). We have heard positive comments about MPC Ready and we look forward to deeper conversations (about our official role) as soon as can be practically accomplished.

MPC Ready would like its organization, and the capabilities of its volunteers, to be formally incorporated into the City's official Emergency Operations Plan, the City's Safety Element (of its General Plan) and the Police Strategic Plan! Our neighboring City, Palo Alto, has an Emergency Operations Center Volunteer program that is our "role model" for how a City can work with resident volunteers. We would like to see a similar effort in Menlo Park. Web Link

Our Block Coordinator recruitment efforts would be so much easier with a formal endorsement from the City of Menlo Park. Until then, we will continue to make progress but it will be slow compared with what it could be!

Lynne Bramlett, Co-Chair, MPC Ready


Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Menlo Park: Park Forest
on May 1, 2020 at 1:34 pm

Given the City's budget crisis now would be a very good time to outsource police services to the Sheriff as do Woodside and Portola Valley. And then look to County OES to embrace the incredible cost effectiveness of Emergency Service Volunteers.

That would save Menlo Park millions every year and provide better service.


Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Menlo Park: Park Forest
on May 2, 2020 at 9:22 am

An excellent article on what Palo Alto is doing:
"Risberg isn't alone in her watchfulness over fellow residents during the public health crisis. Throughout Palo Alto, neighborhood preparedness coordinators like her — members of the city's Emergency Services Volunteers program — have been fanning out, working the phones and checking in on neighbors.

"We are like little owls when we go out ... keeping our radar sharpened," said Risberg, who's been devoting eight hours a day to the role. "Also, we're like farmers: We dig up things that could be potential problems later and nip them in the bud."

The Emergency Services Volunteers (ESV) were quietly activated by the city on March 23 to aid residents during the pandemic. "

Web Link

In contrast the City of Menlo Park refuses to use ESV's and therefore has NO idea what is going on in its neighborhoods.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition..

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Almanac Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.