Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, November 3, 2017, 11:30 AM
Town Square
Editorial: Why we're changing our policy on reporting arrests
Original post made on Nov 3, 2017
Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, November 3, 2017, 11:30 AM
Comments (8)
a resident of Menlo Park: Fair Oaks
on Nov 3, 2017 at 12:42 pm
Why are prominent people treated differently, doesn't everyone have the same right to privacy?
a resident of Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
on Nov 3, 2017 at 3:11 pm
I respect that you've put a lot of thought into his, and there are complex issues and no easy answer.
a resident of Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
on Nov 3, 2017 at 4:34 pm
The new policy is very consistent with our constitutional and judicial framework where an accused person is innocent until proven otherwise beyond a reasonable doubt. It is also consistent with affording those convicted, after having served their punishment, the potential for redemption and the opportunity to get a fresh start.
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Nov 3, 2017 at 5:08 pm
Peter Carpenter is a registered user.
"The new policy is very consistent with our constitutional and judicial framework where an accused person is innocent until proven otherwise beyond a reasonable doubt."
Unless the Almanac unilaterally declares you to be a " prominent person in the community " and then there are no limits on what the Almanac will publish about you.
How commendable that this is the way the Almanac "rewards" those who serve our community.
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Nov 3, 2017 at 5:50 pm
Menlo Voter. is a registered user.
Almanac:
either this applies to everyone or it applies to no one. You don't think a person that doesn't happen to be "prominent in our community" can do something stupid that can screw them in later life? It's ok to screw up someone's life by publishing their name because they're not prominent in the community? This a blatant attempt to protect yourself from lawsuits by "prominent" people in our community. If you're not going to publish names of SOME accused persons then you shouldn't be publishing ANY.
a resident of Atherton: other
on Nov 3, 2017 at 6:08 pm
Menlo Voter, it's the opposite. They're saying they reserve the right to publish if the individual is prominent.
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Nov 4, 2017 at 9:18 am
Menlo Voter. is a registered user.
read it again:
I miss read. In any event it should be all or nothing.
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Nov 5, 2017 at 4:09 am
Silicon Valley millionaire Luke Lonergan never got in his name in the paper when he was arrested for possession pornograhy in a multi-agency sweep in Santa Clara and San Mateo County several years ago. But men who were minorities and poor who were arrested in that same sweep got their names plastered all over the papers. Lonergan had already finished serving his very light term in jail by the time reporters got wind of his case. I suspect many names of wealthy and prominent who are arrested are never released to the local press. That is an issue that should be investigated.
Don't miss out
on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Stay informed.
Get the day's top headlines from Almanac Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.