Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, October 26, 2017, 11:49 AM
Town Square
Portola Valley's school board election has just become more complicated
Original post made on Oct 26, 2017
Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, October 26, 2017, 11:49 AM
Comments (2)
a resident of Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
on Oct 26, 2017 at 6:46 pm
Well, an election would cost a lot less than a 100 million dollar bond measure. So there’s that. But I digress.
In the November election, it’s clear that Klugman, Mafia, and Bechtel will be elected. Considering the tremendous amount of concern already expressed by the community regarding this potential bond measure, it seems that it would be smart to have an election for the two remaining seats, in the Spring, rather than going to appointments. In this way, the school board can avoid accusations of stacking the deck, so to speak, by appointing people already in favor of the bond measure. Or, at least, in favor of development. After all, what is the hurry? Why the insistence on going to a bond measure when you have already shown irresponsibility in going far over budget on the unfinished playgrounds? As of now, the project is $168,000 over budget, and not finished. That’s more than the cost of the potential election.
a resident of Portola Valley: Portola Valley Ranch
on Nov 2, 2017 at 4:55 pm
Some of the candidates sound like they are eager to start spending and building. Maybe let the voters at large have a say. Based on the survey there’s a disconnect between the community and the insiders.
Don't miss out
on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Stay informed.
Get the day's top headlines from Almanac Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.