Town Square

Post a New Topic

Atherton council set to sign contract for Menlo Park fire district review

Original post made on Apr 18, 2017

A $49,500 contract to examine the Menlo Park Fire Protection District's finances, and look at other ways Atherton might get fire services for its residents, is on the Atherton City Council agenda for Wednesday, April 19.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, April 19, 2017, 12:00 AM

Comments (3)

Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Apr 18, 2017 at 1:14 pm

Peter Carpenter is a registered user.

Dear Town Council Members,

Please do not spend $49,500 of the Town of Atherton’s limited tax revenues on the proposed Fire Services “Fiscal Review”.

The Fire District is an independent Special District. The voters in the Fire District, including those residing in Atherton, have elected the five Directors of the Fire Board. The Fire District has NO parcel tax and NO construction bonds. The Fire District lives within its revenue by carefully controlling its total personnel count – which is the primary cost driver for all local agencies.

The proposed review is designed to study something over which the Town Council has no authority and no control. The Town Council cannot change what the Fire District does, how it does what is does, or whom it serves.

The Matrix Project Plan assumes significant time and effort will be provided by Fire District even though the Town has been told repeatedly that such Fire District resources will not be available for this study. It does not appear that the Town has informed the vendor of this critical problem with the vendor’s March 29th Project Plan.

In the highly unlikely event that the majority of the residents of Atherton did vote (and ONLY the residents can make that decision, not the Town Council) to “detach” from the Fire District (which is a very difficult process) such detachment would require the County to allocate to Atherton ONLY the amount currently being spent in Atherton by the Fire District. The Matrix study will be Exhibit 1 in that reallocation process. Hence under State law the portion of the former Fire District property tax revenues that the Town of Atherton would receive would be insufficient to provide the same high level of fire services that the residents currently receive. Instead most of the property taxes currently paid to the Fire District by Atherton residents would have to be reallocated to other NON-Atherton agencies. The property taxes of Atherton residents would not be decreased by a single penny. And the Town would probably need to seek a much higher parcel tax in order to be able to provide for or contract for its own fire services.

When the non-Atherton residents of the Fire District discover that this property tax reallocation process would also mean a reduction in their level of fire services without providing any real benefit to the Town of Atherton you can expect outrage at your actions.

There is no doubt that the residents of Atherton pay more in ALL kinds of taxes than they receive in services – to the school districts, to the Fire District, to the Harbor District, to the Open Space District, to the County, to the State and to the Federal government – but where is the value in spending our limited Town of Atherton tax dollars studying any of these entities and trying to figure out how to somehow pay less than our fair share?

We have an elected Fire Board – let them do their job and let the elected Town Council focus its efforts on our critical needs like police services, roads and drainage.

Sincerely yours,

Peter F. Carpenter


Posted by Linda Craig
a resident of Menlo Park: University Heights
on Apr 19, 2017 at 12:43 pm

Reardless of the merits of the amount of service, and costs thereof, being paid by residents of Atherton, I continue to maintain that Atherton cannot on its own initiative decide who provides fire service. It does not currently provide its own service, so cannot contract out or do a joint power arrangement. The San Mateo County Local Agency Formation Commission would need to determine that it should be detached from MP Fire (after a thorough study) and recommend a new arrangement for the most efficient and effective fire service for all agencies and taxpayers.

This issue is not being addressed by the potential Atherton study, and should be.

[EDITOR'S NOTE: On Page 12 of the Matrix Consulting Group's project plan, it says: "For each option, detailed steps will be developed for how to implement the option along with timelines and conditions that need to be met for the option. Any LAFCO implications will also be discussed in this analysis."


Posted by Name hidden
a resident of Atherton: West of Alameda

on Sep 25, 2017 at 1:40 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition..

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Almanac Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.