Town Square

Post a New Topic

Dionicio R. Lopez Jr, Preliminary Hearing

Original post made by Michael G. Stogner, another community, on Mar 16, 2015

3/13/15 Hon. Judge Gilbert T. Brown, Geoff Carr Defense attorney

Finally a preliminary hearing was held with two District Attorney Inspectors taking the stand, Jordon Boyd and Jamie Draper

Recently our District Attorney has held press conferences to emphasize "Gang" active, also when gang enhancement is added the time in prison goes up, Our DA told the public these cellphones were used to conduct gang related activity." That would be a Bad thing if it actually had happened, according to testimony there is NO evidence it did.

Of course that would be the biggest concern for public safety communication to give orders or instructions to cause harm, injury to witnesses etc. The DA does not have that in this case and he has known that for a long time. What he has is a homesick young man calling mom and girlfriend. They have no evidence of "conduct gang-related evidence."

The DA has 1 out of 2 phones……1 is missing.

When the District Attorney knows what he has is a scary theory and no evidence, he should charge only what he has.

Let's eliminate Prosecutorial Misconduct in San Mateo County. The Supervisors have known about this since 2003

Comments (22)

Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on Mar 16, 2015 at 9:59 am

Several citizens warning the Board of Supervisors in 2003.

Web Link


Posted by trust
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Mar 16, 2015 at 10:00 am

>> That would be a Bad thing if it actually had happened, according to testimony there is NO evidence it did.

Who's testimony? The defendant alone?


Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on Mar 16, 2015 at 11:34 am

Testimony of the District Attorney Inspectors taking the stand, Jordon Boyd and Jamie Draper.



Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on Mar 16, 2015 at 11:36 am

Bay City News Service

Web Link


Posted by trust
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Mar 16, 2015 at 2:37 pm

Thanks for the link.

Someone in jail as a gangmember, has a phone and drugs smuggled in, with the apparent aid of a couple cops, the phone is then used to call 'some' other gangmembers, along with family, who then possibly relay unknown messages to whomever, and on and on...

And it's the DA who is the bad guy here? Is this upside-down world here? Bikers who smuggle phones and drugs into jail are the heroes?

Hollywood already did this story, boys. Ran for seven seasons.

...................

"He talks to a Hells Angel once or twice, but there's no evidence that they did anything or that it's to the furtherance of the gang."

San Mateo County District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe said prosecutors suspect that those calls to family members may have been used to pass messages to gang members.

"Of course our answer to that (argument) is that he is a gang member, and he's doing it while in the jail, and the possession of the phone does give him the ability to connect with gang members," Wagstaffe said."


Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Mar 16, 2015 at 2:44 pm

Menlo Voter is a registered user.

trust:

no one has been convicted yet and our DA acts as if they have. Not only that the DA should be recusing his office given the fact the deputy ran against the sitting sheriff as a write in candidate if for no other reason than the optics are terrible.

And yes, our DA is a bad guy. Perhaps you're new to San Mateo County and are not familiar with the corruption that is this county.


Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on Mar 16, 2015 at 6:43 pm

Defense attorney Carr asked the Inspectors about this Chapter and in the last 5 years how many violent crimes have they been involved in, the answer was I don't know, turns out besides the one case D.L. is charged with there were only 2 weapons possession cases in 5 years.

Also there is ZERO connection with San Mateo County Sheriff Deputy Juan Lopez and these 2 cellphones getting in to the jail….ZERO


Posted by yuppie
a resident of another community
on Mar 16, 2015 at 9:25 pm

A hells angel with 2 weapons charges?


Posted by Burden of proof
a resident of another community
on Mar 16, 2015 at 10:41 pm

Trust, I think what Michael Stogner is trying to say here is that there is evidence the prisoner called his family, but not other gang members. DA Steve Wagstaffe is arguing it stands to reason he passed messages to gang messages through his family. Apparently this carries a higher punishment than just calling the family. But how can Wagstaffe possibly prove this according to the legal standard, beyond a reasonable doubt? I guess it could be true, but it could also simply be the case he was just calling his family. Certainly the possibility it could be true is very far from the legal proof required to sustain a conviction. Wagstaffe has no evidence, zero, of the enhanced charge, but is prosecuting this case as well as Juan Lopez based on this. And as Menlo Voter pointed out, the optics of prosecuting Lopez, who ran against Wagstaffe buddy/crony Greg Munks, is just awful. Let me correct that. I guess Wagstaffe is also prosecuting Lopez's girlfriend.

No one, including Stogner in so far as I can see, is arguing the prisoner/gang member is an angel. Apparently the strategy, used effectively by Wagstaffe, is pointing out he's not, as a justification for everything else that follows. The service performed here by Stogner is going deeper than this superficial level, looking at the actual facts, and this is indeed a service.


Posted by Burden of proof
a resident of another community
on Mar 16, 2015 at 10:49 pm

Just thought of an additional point: if the goal here is to prosecute the gang member for communicating with his gang while in prison, when Wagstaffe found out about the phone, why not get a wire tap to the family, and actually try to gather evidence that messages are being passed? Instead, there was an immediate crack down, and multiple arrests, including Juan Lopez at gunpoint. I guess that's just another indication that despite the pretense, the real goal here was to try to destroy Juan Lopez


Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on Mar 17, 2015 at 6:05 am

Yuppie writes "A hells angel with 2 weapons charges?" not the case.

No that is the entire club activity for 5 years not any one member.

Mr. Carr was asking how violent was this entire charpter in the last 5 years.


Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on Mar 17, 2015 at 6:06 am

Chapter


Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on Mar 17, 2015 at 6:24 am

District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe recently announced that he was dropping all charges against Orvilla Taylor, a SamTrans worker who had been in our Court System for over 3 years. The reason given

LACK OF EVIDENCE

3 years this mans life was turned upside down, he was on unpaid leave, had to prepare to defend and deal with the stress of court.

Lets eliminate Prosecutorial Misconduct in San Mateo County


Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on Mar 18, 2015 at 9:52 am

Prosecutorial Misconduct is something to consider here and this is one reason.

Mr. Lopez has been on administrative leave since July 2014. He was arrested at gunpoint in November 2014 outside his home in Newark over the cellphone smuggling charges, the culmination of an 11-month investigation by the office of District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe -- at the request of Sheriff Greg Munks, Mr. Wagstaffe said.

To bad Mr. Wagstaffe wasn't in the courtroom to hear his two Inspectors testify under oath.

Zero connection to SMC Sheriff Deputy Juan Lopez.

I think Attorney Staurt Hanlon is correct, DA Wagstaffe intends to financially ruin Deputy Lopez.

"The case will work its way through on the facts." Steve Wagstaffe

What a shame it doesn't need Evidence to file charges.

Welcome to San Mateo County


Posted by Jack Hickey
a resident of Woodside: Emerald Hills
on Mar 18, 2015 at 10:54 am

Michael, how long does it take to get a transcript of the testimony of those inspectors? That should be grounds for dismissing some of the charges against Juan.
"To bad Mr. Wagstaffe wasn't in the courtroom to hear his two Inspectors testify under oath.

Zero connection to SMC Sheriff Deputy Juan Lopez."


Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on Mar 18, 2015 at 11:18 am

Jack, not long I think about a week.

Remember DA Steve Wagstaffe contacted Bay City News Service and Scott Morris published that Sheriff Deputy Juan Lopez and his finance "embezzled up to $400,000 of campaign funds for personal use."

When I brought it to their attention, "That was Impossible because he only raised $250."

Does anybody have a guess how much TIME and MONEY is needed to prepare to defend against such an allegation?

What allows DA Steve Wagstaffe to behave this way? The Board of Supervisors who have known about this type of abuse since 2000. Many people have warned them over the years. They have ZERO interest in making SMC safer for all of us.

Welcome to San Mateo County


Posted by trust
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Mar 18, 2015 at 11:30 am

how much MONEY is needed to defend against such an allegation?

No union funded lawyer?

Ouch.


Posted by Poster
a resident of another community
on Mar 18, 2015 at 11:43 am

Why doesn't Juan Lopez' attorney file a motion to dismiss the charges due to insufficient evidence?


Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on Mar 18, 2015 at 11:58 am

Trust says,

No union funded lawyer?

Ouch.

Not one word or $ from the UNION, now that's what I call a TEAM.

Every Sheriff Deputy in our County knows they could be the next Deputy Juan Lopez.


Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on Mar 18, 2015 at 4:26 pm

Another DA Steve Wagstaffe Prosecution.
Why was these gentleman charged at all.

Web Link


Posted by jack Hickey
a resident of Woodside: Emerald Hills
on Mar 18, 2015 at 4:52 pm

I hope Jenkins gets legal fees assessed on the County.


Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on Mar 18, 2015 at 6:04 pm

We have to fix this little problem first.

California's criminal justice system is broken. And as founder of the Veritas Initiative Kathleen Ridolfi told Change.org, the problem of prosecutorial misconduct is "systemic." Tell California lawmakers to do away with prosecutors' absolute immunity. The law must apply to everyone, and there must be consequences for misconduct that jails the innocent and lets the guilty go free.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition..

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Almanac Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.