Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, December 31, 2014, 12:00 AM
Town Square
Guest opinion: Searsville Dam debate continues
Original post made on Dec 30, 2014
Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, December 31, 2014, 12:00 AM
Comments (3)
a resident of Woodside: other
on Dec 30, 2014 at 6:04 pm
A good resolution. Stanford needs to get this safety and legal liability of a dam off their books. Removing the dam is a win, win, win, win……..
a resident of Menlo Park: Stanford Hills
on Dec 30, 2014 at 7:35 pm
Kudos to the Almanac for keeping on this Searsville Dam story, it is THE environmental issue of our time on the peninsula. Removing the dam is an historic opportunity for Stanford to right a past wrong and improve this jewel of a creek that runs through our communities.
a resident of Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
on Dec 31, 2014 at 10:15 am
Thank you Almanac for publishing.
Here are links to documents I reference above:
1) San Mateo County Map showing Searsville Dam adjacent to the most "violent" shaking regions of the San Andreas Fault:
Web Link
2) San Mateo County- Dam Failure Inundation Area (Searsville in Orange)
Web Link
3) San Mateo and U.S. Army Corps listing Searsville Dam as a "High Hazard" dam (p.5)
Web Link
4) Stanford SPEAR3 report describing potential "catastrophic" failure of Searsville Dam (p.7)
Web Link
Don't miss out
on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Stay informed.
Get the day's top headlines from Almanac Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.