Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 8:35 AM
Town Square
Sen. Jerry Hill introduces bill requiring DUI offenders to use 'ignition interlocks'
Original post made on Dec 30, 2014
Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 8:35 AM
Comments (8)
a resident of another community
on Dec 30, 2014 at 12:40 pm
It's a start, but with lots of questions. First, why even allow a third and fourth, etc. conviction? Do we keep giving them chances until they kill somebody? If the second chance doesn't cure them, let them take a bus.
Also, how will we deal with those who have more than one vehicle, or access to somebody else's? Will we install the devices in all of those vehicles, too? Will we be able to control if they have somebody else blow into the device?W
a resident of Menlo Park: The Willows
on Dec 30, 2014 at 1:20 pm
I agree, if someone gets a second conviction within 5 years of their first or a 3rd conviction ever, revoke their drivers license permanently. This law is just a way for the makers of the device to get more money, it won't protect people, there are ways around it (have a friend blow into it, pay a kid $20 to blow it for you, etc.) If you really want to stop people from driving drunk, take away their license, impound their car, and if they keep doing it, lock them up. Don't make up some lame law that only benefits the companies making the device...
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Dec 30, 2014 at 1:29 pm
There should also be a Tetrahydrocannabinol sensor for people who smoke pot or eat those Alice B Toklas brownies and drive.
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Dec 30, 2014 at 3:29 pm
Menlo Voter is a registered user.
Heard Skip Helmig, former CHP Commissioner on the radio today. He has been working with a company that makes these. He said that the technology has advanced to the point that it takes a DNA sample of the person that is supposed to be using the device and compares that every time the device is used. If someone other than the person that is supposed to be using the device tries to blow into it for them the car will not start.
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Dec 30, 2014 at 3:39 pm
SteveC is a registered user.
There should be no 3rd conviction for DUI. The license should be revoked permanently, period. It is a privilege to drive not a right. Should the person continue to drive, impound the vehicle. Should they drive another persons car, impound the car and let the owner pay the fees.
a resident of Menlo Park: Park Forest
on Dec 30, 2014 at 3:59 pm
Someone found a new source of political contributions...........
Fifty bucks a month on top of the original purchase? Great biz model.
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Dec 30, 2014 at 6:33 pm
Menlo Voter is a registered user.
SteveC:
that already happens. The problem is it doesn't take a drivers license to start a car. Until it does you will have people that continue to drive on suspended and revoked drivers licenses. Dumb people will continue to allow people with suspended or revoked licenses to drive their cars. What can I say? Those people are stupid. You can't legislate against stupid.
a resident of Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Dec 31, 2014 at 12:51 pm
This is a good start to a serious problem. Thank you Sen. Hill for taking the lead.
Don't miss out
on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Stay informed.
Get the day's top headlines from Almanac Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.