Town Square

Post a New Topic

Policies regarding the use of Body Worn Cameras by police

Original post made by Peter Carpenter, Atherton: Lindenwood, on Nov 26, 2014

Recent incidents in Menlo Park and Fergusson MO underscore the value of having the police use Body Worn Cameras (BWC's). There has also been considerable discussion on what policies should govern the use of BWCs. Two very helpful reports on this are:

Web Link


Clearly when and how to use these cameras is not a simple issue and the report is well worth reading if you are interested in a fact based discussion.


Here are two interesting excerpts:

"Legitimacy in policing is built on trust. And the notion of video-recording every interac- tion in a very tense situation would simply not be a practical operational way of deliv- ering policing. In fact, it would exacerbate all sorts of problems. In the United Kingdom, we're also subject to human rights legislation, laws on right to privacy, right to family life, and I'm sure you have similar statutes. It's far more complicated than a blanket policy of 'every interaction is filmed.' I think that's far too simplistic. We have to give our officers some discretion. We cannot have a policy that limits discretion of officers to a point where using these devices has a negative effect on community-police relations."
– Sir Hugh Orde, President, Association of Chief Police Officers (UK)
********
"In Daytona Beach, Chief Chitwood requested that the officers with a history of complaints be among the first to be outfitted with body-worn cameras . Although he found that usually the videos demonstrated that "the majority of the officers are hardworking, good police," he has also seen how body-worn cameras can help an agency address discipline problems . Chitwood said:
We had an officer who had several questionable incidents in the past, so we outfitted him with a camera . Right in the middle of an encounter with a subject, the camera goes blank, and then it comes back on when the incident is over . He said that the camera malfunctioned, so we gave him another one . A week later he goes to arrest a woman, and again, the camera goes blank just before the encounter . He claimed again that the camera had malfunctioned . So we conducted a forensic review of the camera, which determined that the officer had intentionally hit the power button right before the camera shut off . Our policy says that if you turn it off, you're done . He resigned the next day ."

The second article is:

Web Link

Here is the current MPPD policy on BWC's:

Web Link

This document is strangely copy protected and you cannot cut and paste from it.

Frankly, I think the generic MPPD policy ( written by Lexipol) leaves a lot to be desired. For example, it mandates that all citizen contact recordings be saved for 2 1/2 years. And it has no obvious exception for interrogation of confidential informants.

What are your thoughts?

Comments (1)

Posted by all things
a resident of Menlo Park: Belle Haven
on Nov 26, 2014 at 2:40 pm

Protect and support our police. Record EVERYTHING. Have a reasonable policy to delete trivial stuff within a reasonable period, and protect it from prying eyes.

Officers should have no expectation of privacy in the public workplace.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition..

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Almanac Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.