see:
Web Link
and
Web Link
Talk about adding distraction to El Camino traffic and just being plain obnoxious, this really is a prime example.
Original post made by Morris Brown, Menlo Park: Park Forest, on Sep 13, 2014
Comments (5)
Morris,
Sorry that you cannot handle the truth and that you are so eager to suppress other people's right of free expression.
And this sign is just one of the first of many that will appear to ensure that a low turnout election of zealots does not succeed with Measure M.
Measure M is a Mistake
M NO
So Yes on M signs are good; No on M are obnoxious. It's not difficult to understand where you stand. This is another great example of how 'Yes" advocates use the Almanac blog to ridicule anyone who opposes them yet continue to
avoid ANY fact-based messaging and discussions.
I just received from City Attorney Bill McClure a note, that such a sign, being political in nature in not covered by the Menlo Park sign ordinance, and as such is ok.
morris brown
Nice of you to check on that Morris.
If a more vibrant Menlo Park is the goal -- one shared by both sides on this issue, it seems -- that sign certainly qualifies as vibrant.
Don't miss out
on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Get the day's top headlines from Almanac Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.