Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, September 10, 2014, 11:29 AM
Town Square
Woodside: Stop-work order lifted for mansion
Original post made on Sep 10, 2014
Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, September 10, 2014, 11:29 AM
Comments (6)
a resident of Woodside: Mountain Home Road
on Sep 10, 2014 at 12:18 pm
now the speeding trucks will return to Mountain Home Road.....
a resident of Menlo Park: University Heights
on Sep 10, 2014 at 12:48 pm
Buying a 3-year-old, 7400-square-foot house for $117 million and then drastically remodeling it to add even more space. Only in Woodside.
a resident of Woodside: Family Farm/Hidden Valley
on Sep 10, 2014 at 1:26 pm
If the Almanac article accurately describes what transpired at last night's Woodside Town Council meeting, I really can't believe the Council members fell for the applicant's story. Each time the applicant has appeared before a Town body to discuss their failure to abide by project conditions they originally embraced, they've come up with a different reason for why they intentionally (after being explicitly and repeatedly warned not to) ignored those conditions. The first-floor-was-connected-to-the-basement justification, to my knowledge, has never been offered before. If that excuse hadn't worked last night, I wonder what they would have tried next... Furthermore, the massive 'rainwater' cistern has ALWAYS been part of their project--so the TC's citing it as a new condition for lifting the stop-work order is rather hypocritical. Speaking as a Town resident, I'm very disappointed in our Council's actions.
Almanac staff writer
on Sep 10, 2014 at 2:16 pm
Dave Boyce is a registered user.
Representatives for the applicant described the first-floor-and-basement-ceiling issue in testimony before the Planning Commission at its July 31 meeting.
As for the cistern, staff noted last night that there is indeed an existing cistern on the property. Another cistern may be a possibility, but it may not survive review by the planning director. It was mentioned in the staff report as an example of a sustainability related element, not as something that had to be done.
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Sep 10, 2014 at 2:25 pm
Remember folks, money talks. And big money talks really LOUD.
Almanac staff writer
on Sep 10, 2014 at 2:53 pm
Dave Boyce is a registered user.
Correction; the large cistern may be in the plans, not existing. In any case, the idea of the cistern per se as a sustainable element was noted by someone at the council meeting as an adjunct to another cistern already conceived of for this project.
Don't miss out
on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Stay informed.
Get the day's top headlines from Almanac Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.