Town Square

Post a New Topic

Woodside: Stop-work order lifted for mansion

Original post made on Sep 10, 2014

After more than two months of enforced idleness, the stop-work order issued in July at 360 Mountain Home Road in Woodside has been lifted and construction work can resume on a residential remodeling project there.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, September 10, 2014, 11:29 AM

Comments (6)

Posted by cc
a resident of Woodside: Mountain Home Road
on Sep 10, 2014 at 12:18 pm

now the speeding trucks will return to Mountain Home Road.....


Posted by Ethan
a resident of Menlo Park: University Heights
on Sep 10, 2014 at 12:48 pm

Buying a 3-year-old, 7400-square-foot house for $117 million and then drastically remodeling it to add even more space. Only in Woodside.


Posted by Rick
a resident of Woodside: Family Farm/Hidden Valley
on Sep 10, 2014 at 1:26 pm

If the Almanac article accurately describes what transpired at last night's Woodside Town Council meeting, I really can't believe the Council members fell for the applicant's story. Each time the applicant has appeared before a Town body to discuss their failure to abide by project conditions they originally embraced, they've come up with a different reason for why they intentionally (after being explicitly and repeatedly warned not to) ignored those conditions. The first-floor-was-connected-to-the-basement justification, to my knowledge, has never been offered before. If that excuse hadn't worked last night, I wonder what they would have tried next... Furthermore, the massive 'rainwater' cistern has ALWAYS been part of their project--so the TC's citing it as a new condition for lifting the stop-work order is rather hypocritical. Speaking as a Town resident, I'm very disappointed in our Council's actions.


Posted by Dave Boyce
Almanac staff writer
on Sep 10, 2014 at 2:16 pm

Dave Boyce is a registered user.

Representatives for the applicant described the first-floor-and-basement-ceiling issue in testimony before the Planning Commission at its July 31 meeting.

As for the cistern, staff noted last night that there is indeed an existing cistern on the property. Another cistern may be a possibility, but it may not survive review by the planning director. It was mentioned in the staff report as an example of a sustainability related element, not as something that had to be done.


Posted by whatever
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Sep 10, 2014 at 2:25 pm

Remember folks, money talks. And big money talks really LOUD.


Posted by Dave Boyce
Almanac staff writer
on Sep 10, 2014 at 2:53 pm

Dave Boyce is a registered user.

Correction; the large cistern may be in the plans, not existing. In any case, the idea of the cistern per se as a sustainable element was noted by someone at the council meeting as an adjunct to another cistern already conceived of for this project.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition..

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Almanac Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.