Town Square

Post a New Topic

Measure M - No EIR, No public hearings, No traffic study

Original post made by Peter Carpenter, Atherton: Lindenwood, on Sep 3, 2014

Voters need to know that there was NO EIR done on Measure M, there were NO public hearings and NO traffic study. And the Measure M supporters refuse to discuss what might be the consequences of Measure M forcing owners of adjacent properties to develop those properties separately and in an uncoordinated manner. Measure M supporters refuse to discuss the consequences of encouraging property owners to develop large 3 and 4 bedrooms residential units since only office uses are restricted under the measure.

Without an EIR, without public hearings, without a traffic study voters should simply vote NO on M.

Comments (2)

Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Sep 4, 2014 at 7:03 pm
Peter Carpenter is a registered user.

Here is a great quote from a Measure M supporter:

"I will not be hurt if M fails. I just hope it gets enough votes to send the message."

Email Town Square Moderator      


Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Sep 4, 2014 at 7:50 pm
Menlo Voter is a registered user.

"I will not be hurt if M fails. I just hope it gets enough votes to send the message."

brilliant

Email Town Square Moderator      


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition..

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Almanac Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Most Viewed Stories

See today's stories