Many of us have expressed concern that crime may rise if Flood Park is closed. This article seems to suggest that our fears have been unfounded - of course there hasn't been a spike in crime - the park has been occupied by construction crews working on the pipeline project! Maybe the SFPUC will offer to patrol the park for us after the pipeline is done...

It's nice to see The Almanac follow up on issues of concern to the community, and to know that so far Flood Park hasn't become a blight to a lovely family-oriented neighborhood. But please remember that the park hasn't been closed long enough to become abandoned. There are signs along the road to show the neighborhood's interest and attention. There's work going on and construction materials in sight that signal supervision and occupation. Let's hope we don't have to put it to the test and find out what use that land ends up providing after it's been overgrown and deserted for a year or two.

This article fails to take into account the fact that the park is currently full of workers and equipment each day as the pipeline project is finished. Once the workers leave, the shuttered park will truly be empty and abandoned. Neighbors fear an increase in crime once the park is truly locked up and empty of pipeline workers, rangers and park guests. Current crime rates do not reflect the potential for trouble once the park is truly empty.

I think all of the comments posted so far hit the nail on the head as to why the statistics in this article are misleading.

My comment is on the cost of maintaining the park. The $205,000 is what it previously cost to maintain the park. However, has anyone tried to ask for volunteers to help maintain the park until the funding situation improves? The neighborhoods surrounding Flood Park have a strong sense of community. I believe that there would be more than enough volunteers by neighbors to significantly lower the cost of operating the park. I think that if a little more effort were put into thinking of creative ways to help keep the park open, such as organizing social events such as "Movie in the Park" night, that the park could be profitable. Closing the park is an uncreative, and for me unacceptable, solution to a very solvable problem.

No crime yet? Oh, people can come up with statistics to prove anything- forfty percent of all people know that. What's more important is what you FEEL should be true. There are probably drug dealers heading there right now. You can spot them by their baggy pants and sassy attitudes.