Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 12:00 AM
Town Square
New Atherton rule: Is aim to stifle dissent?
Original post made on Jul 5, 2009
Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 12:00 AM
Comments (4)
Posted by Even straighter
a resident of Atherton: West Atherton
on Jul 5, 2009 at 5:47 pm
a resident of Atherton: West Atherton
on Jul 5, 2009 at 5:47 pm
[Post removed; off-point comments posted by same person using different names]
Posted by glenn
a resident of Atherton: other
on Jul 6, 2009 at 6:25 am
a resident of Atherton: other
on Jul 6, 2009 at 6:25 am
[Post removed; off-point comments posted by same person using different names]
Posted by On-point comment
a resident of Atherton: West Atherton
on Jul 6, 2009 at 10:54 am
a resident of Atherton: West Atherton
on Jul 6, 2009 at 10:54 am
It is plainly wrong for the Atherton Town Council to attempt to stifle dissent by restricting the open discussion of issues.
Although the Almanac has taken the correct side of this issue through its well-written editorial, I sense the irony attached to this opinion being made along with the wholesale deletion of posts by the Almanac that express dissent with certain governmental affairs in Atherton as well.
I am not John Johns.
Posted by Name hidden
a resident of Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle
on Jun 5, 2017 at 4:07 pm
a resident of Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle
on Jun 5, 2017 at 4:07 pm
Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?
Don't miss out
on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Stay informed.
Get the day's top headlines from Almanac Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.
