https://n2v.almanacnews.com/square/print/2017/01/23/menlo-park-streets-need-to-be-safer-for-kids


Town Square

Menlo Park Streets Need to Be Safer for Kids

Original post made by Jen Wolosin, Parents for Safe Routes, Menlo Park: other, on Jan 23, 2017

While many have set their eyes on Washington DC over the past week, a growing group of concerned citizens have also had their gaze focused on Menlo Park. On Tuesday, January 17th, we launched Parents for Safe Routes (www.parents4saferoutes.org). Inspired by the national Safe Routes to School movement (http://saferoutespartnership.org), Parents for Safe Routes is a group of dedicated families and neighbors committed to helping kids get to school safely.

We have experienced firsthand what it’s like to pedal down a Menlo Park street with our young children, fighting for space along narrow roads with cars, other bikes, and pedestrians, concerned for our safety. We have seen countless near misses between commuters speeding and kids trying to cross busy streets. We have driven our kids to school, one by one, because, even though we live so close, we didn’t think the streets were safe enough to allow for walking or biking.

We have decided to stop complaining about the situation and take action. We believe that by working together we can make a difference in our community. Parents for Safe Routes sees ourselves as partners with Schools and the City/County (and other relevant jurisdictions), ready to do the work to make the lives of our children, and the larger community safer and better. Traffic is only getting worse in our area, and the more we can do to reduce single occupancy driving, the better off we all will be. We invite all those in the community, who are concerned about traffic, to join us.

While our website has information about our vision and a list of Menlo Park community leaders who are on our Advisory Committee, some important things to note include:

- We are here to improve the conditions to and from EVERY school. Our ultimate scope will include schools in all public school districts (MPCSD, Las Lomitas, Ravenswood and Sequoia) and all private schools. We want to be as inclusive and thorough as possible.
- This is a marathon, not a sprint. It will take time to work through the multi-jurisdictional complexities of our area and to network and navigate through the community, schools and the agencies. We are committed to sticking with this.
- We are not here to dictate a solution to problems. We are here to help identify areas that need improvement and to offer our support.
- We are not here to point fingers or to harp on how things have been. We are looking towards the future and optimistic that by working together, we can make a difference.
- While our name is "Parents" for Safe Routes, we also want to include neighbors and anyone concerned about traffic, in the conversation.
- We are not anti-car or anti-parking. We support all efforts to reduce single occupancy vehicle driving to schools, including carpools, more busing and other creative solutions.
- We are a work in progress and, to borrow from Silicon Valley speak, we plan to "pivot" when and where it makes sense.

Parents for Safe Routes will work with Schools and the City/County (and other relevant jurisdictions) across all 6 E’s of Safe Routes. These areas include Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Encouragement, Evaluation and Equity.

As our first act of business, we respectfully request that on Tuesday, January 24th, the Menlo Park City Council adopt both the Transportation Commission and Bicycle Commission’s 2-year work plans that prioritize Safe Routes to Schools. In addition, we request that at the Friday, January 27th Goal Setting Meeting, the City Council prioritize Safe Routes to Schools and allocate resources and funding toward this goal as appropriate. A more strategic and comprehensive approach to Safe Routes is needed. To sign our online letter to City Council, please visit Web Link

Amid a national climate of divisiveness, we hope that locally, we will be able to unite around our kids and each other. We look forward to beginning the process. Please join us.

For more informatiaon visit www.parents4saferoutes.org and join our mailing list at Web Link

Comments

Posted by Pedestrian
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Jan 24, 2017 at 1:53 am

I'm really curious which roads you are referring to when you wrote: "We have experienced firsthand what's it's like to pedal down a Menlo Park Street with our young children, fighting for space along narrow roads with cars, other bikes and pedestrians, concerned for our safety." I'm also curious why you included pedestrians as part of the problem? I don't often see hoards of pedestrians walking down streets without sidewalks in Menlo Park. I do see pedestrians walking along Creek Drive/Bay Laural/ San Mateo Drive near the bike bridge. There are no sidewalks in that area so pedestrians have no choice but to walk on the street. Traffic is light on those roads so no one has to "fight" for space. It's also not that difficult for a biker to ride around a pedestrian or another bike - it just takes a quick glance behind to check for cars, and as long as bikers obey traffic laws (not running stop signs, etc...) there shouldn't be a problem with pedestrians. If you and your children are uncomfortable doing so, perhaps you shouldn't ride bikes on the dangerous roads.

I'm also curious to know which streets, close to your school, you feel are too unsafe for waking or biking. Are there sidewalks your children can walk on? Bike lanes to ride in? Are you worried about them crossing streets or just walking along the road? If the road has no sidewalk I can see that you would be apprehensive allowing them to walk to school. If that's the case, I suggest you and your neighbors petition the city to install sidewalks. If there are sidewalks but you are concerned with your children crossing the street, teach them to "stop, look and listen." I learned that when I was young and never had a problem - - still don't today walking everywhere in Menlo Park.

I grew up when parents didn't hover over their kids every second. We were expected to get ourselves to and from school from kindergarten on. Sure, there wasn't as much traffic then (probably because parents weren't driving their kids to school) but we still had to be careful and were taught how to navigate the streets safely. We also developed street smarts because we were allowed to venture out on our own as children.

Is it really that dangerous biking/walking to schools? Every school I pass in the morning (MA, Nativity, Encinal), have either crossing guards or traffic lights nearby. Without identifying the problem in the original post, e.g. lack of bike lanes, sidewalks, crosswalks, crossing guards, or simply too much traffic, it's difficult to help find a solution. I personally think that parents driving their kids to school in SUVs are part of the problem- - you can see them backed up on Middlefield, waiting to turn left at Encinal, or blocking traffic on Oak Grove, waiting to turn left at Nativity School. It's amazing how much lighter traffic is when school is out for the summer.






Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Jan 24, 2017 at 7:04 am

Peter Carpenter is a registered user.

Whatever you do/recommend/request please do not further impair the access of emergency response vehicles on their primary response routes - or we will all suffer the consequences.


Posted by Two Centavos
a resident of Atherton: other
on Jan 24, 2017 at 8:41 am

This is a classic fiscal federalism problem. The local governments' revenue is spoken for and is largely capped by prop 13 and laws surrounding user fees. They have no ability to raise revenue or pay for these roadway improvements. They would need to re-prioritizing their expenditures at the cost of essential services.

In addition, there are communities who feel adding more lanes would only cause more traffic. Low cost fixes such as closing roadways or lanes to vehicles in favor of bikes and pedestrians are really non-starters. Bike lanes without roadway widening really amounts to putting lipstick (green paint) on a pig (narrow roadway).

The real fix to the congestion and safety problem caused by inadequate infrastructure will be in the form of roadway widening or additional dedicated bike and pedestrian facilities. Some unitary forms of government (Netherlands, Denmark) have been successful with this. Those efforts have relied on funding from the central government, not the local municipalities. The U.S. has a federal form of government where this burden falls on the local government which does not have the funding, particularly after their ability to raise revenues were limited.

The answer is found in Sacramento or Washington, DC in the form of grants. Federal help will not be coming with the election of a conservative administration which does not look favorably on 'progressive' California. The state has its own budget constraints and priority problems. High speed rail and delta smelt tunnels are somewhat higher on the priority list than pedestrian and bicycle safety in this area.


Posted by enforcement needed
a resident of Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Jan 24, 2017 at 9:15 am

Safety is important not just for kids but also for adults. I hope the effort encourages the City to enforce its laws. Far too many intersections are almost blind because of vegetation, sometimes purposely planted tall shrubs, that are in the supposed sight triangle. These obliterate visibility of bikers, pedestrians, cars, and even of stop signs. Example of the later is at corner of Cambridge and University.

The city's code enforcement is understaffed and seems to run by complaints only. Anyone could take an inventory of unsafe corners and report them, ideally on a regular basis. The Council should adequately fund code enforcement so they can be proactive, not only reactive.


Posted by MPCSD parent
a resident of Menlo Park: Menlo Oaks
on Jan 24, 2017 at 10:51 am

Jen, thank you for helping to organize this effort. I would like to see improved safe routes in particular near Laurel (Lower) and M-A and will be signing up for your mailing list. I have seen a number of near misses on Ringwood and Coleman especially in the afternoons. There are no sidewalks, at times parked cars can force pedestrians into the roadway, and the lousy drainage makes things worse in the rain. This would be mostly a San Mateo County issue? Thank goodness most drivers are willing to be patient and drive safely.

I think Mr. Carpenter's point is an excellent one and perhaps emergency responders might be included in the initial discussions.


Posted by MA/HV Parent
a resident of Menlo Park: Menlo Oaks
on Jan 24, 2017 at 1:23 pm

Jen, thanks for the effort and good luck in your endeavour. Having been a participant in both the Laurel and Encinal SRTS programs, I can say that taking the program out of the city's hands is a good first step. PLEASE do not follow their lead and seek funding to hire cookie-cutter consultants who are not familiar with the local landscape. Both of the recent SRTS programs at those schools left significant safety issues unaddressed while addressing petty concerns.

I can see from the Merc News that a big piece of your concern is Coleman Ave. I would caution against making this just another forum to force street changes there. I am not a resident, but I imagine most people who bought along Coleman did so in part because of the rural look. It's not their fault that the multi-generational poor planning of the MPCSD and SUHSD has turned Coleman into a student transportation thoroughfare.

There is one element of your plan that I would highlight/promote, and that is making the effort city-wide, to include all schools public and private. My understanding is that this is how the problem has been addressed in Palo Alto to great success. I have had kids attend LR, EN, HV, and MA, and as they got older they always passed at least one school to get to another.

Pedestrian, you asked about traffic concerns for cyclists and then commented on 3 of the least traveled roads in town. They are not at issue. Although having cycled on Creek, I can say that its width, winding path, and parked cars can make for occasional discomfort. The issues are more significant along roads like Ringwood, Willow, Coleman, Bay, Woodland, Santa Cruz, Oak Grove, Valparaiso, Sharon Rd, Altschul. The issues can be cars parked in bike lanes, traffic, poorly controlled intersections, narrow roads. I agree with you that we are living in a helicopter-parent world, and that the largest traffic contributor is other parents driving their kids to school, but the problem is real. I am a cyclist and could show you half a dozen places in town (most on school routes) where I have either witnessed bike accidents or had a near miss myself.


Posted by Parents who would like to use bike more often
a resident of Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Jan 24, 2017 at 3:30 pm

I've stopped using bikes to go to school last year because I had several near accidents on Middle Avenue with my 5 year old son. The shared space between parking space and bike lane doesn't work. The children are also too close to the cars: a white line is not enough for a separation. The inclination of the bike space doesn't help either. A lot of road crossings are complicated to go through, it is hard to make one's way between the cars. So when children are following, it is even harder.

I had to use the bikes again to go to school this week as my car was at the garage. We went through Creek drive. Two mornings, two near misses with cars moving bacwards from their driveways. When I pass pedestrians on this road, I hope there will be no car coming because we are in the middle of the road and the visibility is bad.

I think that having a dedicated space for each type of means of locmotion is possible. I have ideas for that. I also have a lot of feedback to give if someone is interested to hear about it. I keep using my bike sometimes. Menlo Park could be a great place for bicycles. There's space, it is mostly flat, the weather is beautiful (most of the time!!) . When it is safe enough to go from one place to another by bike, people will discover the many benefits there are riding.



Posted by MP Resident
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Jan 24, 2017 at 3:48 pm

We could do an awful lot towards better, safer, more efficient transportation (and better access for fire and EMS!) if we got out of the mindset that we should provide storage for private automobiles along public routes. If it's residential, park in a driveway / parking lot (for condos / apartments / etc); if it's commercial, there should be a few decks, and get rid of street parking entirely where possible. It makes things better and safer for everybody.


Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Jan 24, 2017 at 4:10 pm

Peter Carpenter is a registered user.

Parents for Safe Routes has reached out to the Fire District and the Fire Chief has assigned District staff to work with the group.

This is an excellent example of cooperation - thanks.


Posted by resident
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Jan 24, 2017 at 5:51 pm

Eliminating on-street parking in school zones will make plenty of room for emergency vehicles. Use the space for bike lanes. Cars always have trouble getting out of the way of emergency vehicles, but bicycles do not.


Posted by mk
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Jan 24, 2017 at 6:08 pm

Lots of things increase emergency response time. Living in Lindenwood, with few entry and exit points, means emergency response takes longer. But I bet Lindenwood residents would not trade in their exclusivity for easier emergency access. Other people get to make trade offs too. Some people may want safer streets for kids on bikes even if it does slightly increase emergency response time. Better to avoid the emergency altogether, right?



Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Jan 24, 2017 at 6:15 pm

Peter Carpenter is a registered user.

" Living in Lindenwood, with few entry and exit points, means emergency response takes longer"

Wrong. There are seven entrances to Lindenwood and the routes to Lindenwood from Stations 1, 6 and 3 are not in any way impeded by lack of access. There is practically no on-street parking in Lindenwood.


Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Jan 24, 2017 at 6:31 pm

Peter Carpenter is a registered user.

This is from the Fire District's independent Standards of Coverage report:

"Finding #5: A neighborhood-based fire unit within a best practice recommendation of 4 minutes travel time covers all of the District's neighborhoods, except for small outer-edge areas."


Posted by Someone who cares
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Jan 24, 2017 at 9:18 pm

Jen - Thank you for your work on this project. I really appreciate how you are working with the whole community and also the City, it is clear you have done your research. And getting a compliment from Peter - that is significant, proud Menlo Park moment!

Pedestrian. In this whole piece I never got from Jen that she was a helicopter parent. Did you watch the videos, read the links she supplied? As you may or may not know the immediate area around MA High School is divided in it's *coverage* between the MP Police, San Mateo County, and the Atherton Police. Did you know Jen is working with all three? Do you think it is easy to get all three departments together for a meeting let alone for raising awareness? Did you know there are no sidewalks on Ringwood which is the main access to MA from the East side of Menlo Park, that's right, none. Do you know that kids walk those streets every day? Sometimes they bike too. Many of them are walking all the way from East Menlo Park. Oh, and they come in from Coleman, which also has no sidewalks on it's San Mateo County stretch. And Coleman is covered by the City of MP and San Mateo County...guess how that works. If you have not seen any issues I'd encourage you to hang out on Coleman Ave at Santa Monica between 7:45 am and 8:30am. There you will see cars, the school buses, bikes, scooters and walkers all trying to share a road with no sidewalks (except the 100 yds of SM County spot) and no bike lane. Then you can move down to Ringwood just north of Coleman from 8:30-9:15am and watch the high school kids navigate by car, bike and foot with other cars and buses. Oh and wait, the City and District can't afford crossing guards on Willow so all those kids and cars and bikes and scooters and buses are crossing Willow to get to Laurel and MA High School with NO crossing guard fighting with traffic heading to Facebook going East and to Stanford going West. Please don't put this on overparenting, it's just not accurate.

Thanks Jen, your work is appreciated!


Posted by concerned la entrada parent
a resident of Menlo Park: University Heights
on Jan 25, 2017 at 12:07 pm

No one has mentioned Alameda de la Pulgas yet. It is a huge issue for La Entrada students who cross this very busy traffic route during the morning rush hour. Drivers travel the Alameda like it's a highway, not part of a pedestrian route to school. Just a couple of weeks ago, a large truck ran the red light at Sharon Rd at a high speed, and nearly struck a groups of students in the crosswalk.

Up until I complained about this incident, I had never seen any speed enforcement along the Alameda. Yet, I regularly see the Sheriff and MPPD all at the Starbucks a block away on Avy, at the same time that our kids are out trying to cross this perilous street.


Posted by Katie Behroozi
a resident of Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle
on Jan 25, 2017 at 12:18 pm

Concerned La Entrada parent, I agree that the Alameda/Santa Cruz/Avy triangle is treacherous for bikes, pedestrians, and residents along the route. It's unfortunately a multi-jurisdictional neighborhood, with portions belonging to Menlo Park and portions being unincorporated county lands. And apparently there's a rule about which police departments can enforce speed in certain areas (I can't remember the rule, but it's not straightforward). If memory serves, the Avy Starbucks is the favored spot for Atherton PD, which wouldn't have license to trap speeders in the Menlo Park or County sections of that area.

Joe Lococo (San Mateo County Transportation Dept) and Don Horsley (Board of Supervisors) recently hosted a meeting at Oak Knoll to talk with area residents about safety issues in this area. My understanding is that they will evaluate a number of options, e.g. reduced speed limits, visual designs that make that stretch look more like a neighborhood and less like a highway, etc.

If you live in unincorporated Menlo Park, you should reach out to Don and Joe and share your concerns. If you live in Menlo Park city limits, you can bring this to the attention of City Council by emailing city.council@menlopark.org.

In the meantime, please consider joining the Parents for Safe Routes group, which is meant to address the needs of all kids living and/or attending school in Menlo Park.


Posted by concerned la entrada parent
a resident of Menlo Park: University Heights
on Jan 25, 2017 at 12:35 pm

I have been in touch with County and the Sheriffs Office. The County and City hosted a similar meeting a Las Lomitas over a year ago but nothing has changed. The County Sheriff is spread too thin, even if the Alameda is in their jurisdiction. Sharon Road approaching La Entrada is the City's jurisdiction so we desperately need coordination. But I haven't seen any action yet, not even ongoing speed enforcement.


Posted by curious mom
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Jan 25, 2017 at 4:43 pm

How safe will Santa Cruz be after the sidewalk project ends? It looks to me as if the street will be more narrow, making the area where our kids bike now more narrow, too. That's because the new sidewalks look as if they will be placed into the street. That would cut into the space kids use now when they bike in groups (sure to continue!)

Can anyone clear up whether the biking area will be the same or narrower?


Posted by first step
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Jan 26, 2017 at 12:23 pm

First step towards bicycle safety: OBEY THE LAWS!! Stop at all stop signs. no ear plugs, phones, texting and other distractions. Ride single-file. STOP AT ALL STOP signs. it really is not the driver's fault when bikers cruise through stop signs as though the signs really say "speed up" or "have no concern for others". When you come to a stop sign---STOP! it is YOUR life that is on the line.

By the way, this also applies to drivers.


Posted by Downtowner
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Jan 26, 2017 at 1:41 pm

Lindenwood, Menlo Oaks, & Encinal Ave. (M'field to Laurel) have never had sidewalks, which was apparent when those residents bought their homes.
Cross-town traffic is much worse since Hillview became the only MPCSD middle school. East side kids in grades which used to go to Encinal now have to ride/walk farther, making it more likely to encounter traffic hazards & increasing the likelihood that parents will drive the east of El Camino students.
Scooters are more dangerous than bikes & without pneumatic tires are meant to be used on smooth sidewalks, where they interfere with pedestrians.
The bump-out corner at Santa Cruz & Doyle for the benefit of Left Bank increases the danger for cars & cyclists. I was stopped 1 car from the stopsign, waiting for a light change at El Camino, when a cyclist & a skater passed me. The skater bumped into my stopped vehicle. Paint scrape, for me. I also see hoverboards on downtown sidewalks. Those are illegal for under-16 yr old but sidewalk legality is up to each town. If I get run into by a hoverboard, I may sue MP. Sidewalks are already dangerous for pedestrians in MP, with small kids on bikes & tots in big strollers.
Double parking on SantaCruz Ave downtown adds danger. This is not usually delivery trucks but passenger vehicles, mom behind the wheel waiting for kid in a store. Where are the traffic patrols? Very quick to give overtime parking tickets but useless at much else.
The schools need to have regular bike safety assemblies, with a cop telling them the rules. Start by observing stop signs & walking bikes across the streets, in crosswalks. Wear helmets. Have lights & reflectors for dim light.
The more development MP allows, the worse the traffic problems become, impacting pedestrians, drivers, cyclists, and skaters. Let's not forget hoverboards & segways, which I've also seen on sidewalks.


Posted by Downtowner
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Jan 26, 2017 at 1:52 pm

@ concerned La Entrada parent -
There are traffic signals on Alameda d.l.p. @ Sharon Rd, Avy, Santa Cruz, & Valparairso. Can you teach your kids to cross at the lights? And stay on the curb & out of crosswalks until their light turns green? Seems a good safety rule & should help your problems.
I see those children in the crosswalks, waiting for the light to turn, or riding bikes across against the lights, or at Harkins with no light. Or is it too much trouble to go 1 block to a controlled intersection?


Posted by neighbor
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Jan 27, 2017 at 8:49 am

We need MP PD to write tickets. Middle Ave is a race course for cars 7-8am when K-5 kids are riding bikes to Oak Knoll. I've experienced numerous tailgaters and dangerous drivers entering the bike lane at high speed to go around a car that is waiting to turn onto side streets. I pray that none of these drivers change a child's life and there's forever.

THINK ! Your commute can handle an extra 2 minutes.


Posted by neighbor
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Jan 27, 2017 at 8:39 pm

Correction: RUIN a child's life and their own forever !