Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, January 8, 2015, 8:35 AM
https://n2v.almanacnews.com/square/print/2015/01/08/county-judges-downgrade-felony-cases-for-369-since-mid-december
Town Square
Judges downgrade felony cases for 369 people
Original post made on Jan 8, 2015
Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, January 8, 2015, 8:35 AM
Comments
Posted by Holly L.
a resident of Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
on Jan 8, 2015 at 8:41 am
Holly L. is a registered user.
a resident of Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
on Jan 8, 2015 at 8:41 am
Holly L. is a registered user.
Still can't get over that Munks is still Sheriff, given that he was caught [part removed - he was not charged or convicted] by going into a house with trafficked underaged girls. [part removed.]
Posted by Downtowner
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Jan 8, 2015 at 1:36 pm
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Jan 8, 2015 at 1:36 pm
@ Holly L - Agreed.
Munks claimed that he & his deputy thought they were going to this run-down suburban Las Vegas house for "massages." No way! Massages are available easily through the hotels & spas. This "house" & its operators had been under investigation for using underaged trafficked prostitutes & Munks was there as a customer when the place was raided. Hardly his finest moment. An LV prosecutor told me that it would have been impossible for a couple of visiting conference attendees seeking legitimate massages to stumble into this brothel. Deals were made on Munks' behalf.
This man is not anyone I want in our law enforcement group. His friends must be very powerful, which makes me suspect his supporters too. [part removed - don't make allegations of misconduct based on hints.] I will never vote for or do business with anyone allied with our sheriff in any way.
Posted by Sheriff Bart
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Jan 8, 2015 at 1:49 pm
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Jan 8, 2015 at 1:49 pm
The article is about pop 47, not Munks.
Same ol, same ol.... look at a weather report, and the usual suspects are putting notes in the comment section about the sheriff.
Curiosity is getting the better of me, so I'll ask: Holly and downtowner - who did you vote for? Did you write in Sheriff Joe Arpaio?
Glad the prop passed. Time to get drug offenders out of jail.
Posted by Downtowner
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Jan 8, 2015 at 2:42 pm
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Jan 8, 2015 at 2:42 pm
Arpaio? Never did, never would! The point is why SMC doesn't deserve or can't get an honourable person for sheriff.
Posted by Holly L.
a resident of Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
on Jan 8, 2015 at 3:55 pm
Holly L. is a registered user.
a resident of Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
on Jan 8, 2015 at 3:55 pm
Holly L. is a registered user.
Um, Sheriff Bart? Did you read the article? Munks gave an interview to this reporter. He is quoted. He is fair game. Sorry, but I can't respect a Sheriff who visited a brothel for underaged, trafficked girls. [part deleted.]
He should have resigned.
But cowardly, he refused in the recent election to talk to any reporter about Operation Dollhouse. He's a public figure. He's a big boy. If he can't stand the heat, he should get out of the kitchen.
Posted by Memories
a resident of another community
on Jan 8, 2015 at 5:28 pm
a resident of another community
on Jan 8, 2015 at 5:28 pm
Gotta love a corrupt sheriff who was against this passing, when he himself has been [part deleted - he was not arrested] for something that harms others. When will he leave office? Perhaps by next election a better candidate will be put forward?
Holly - I enjoyed reading your comments.
Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Jan 8, 2015 at 5:50 pm
Menlo Voter is a registered user.
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Jan 8, 2015 at 5:50 pm
Menlo Voter is a registered user.
The problem is that the sheeple of San Mateo County are too self involved to worry about their sheriff [part deleted]. They just keep electing him. Same goes for our DA.
