For more please read the NRO article:
Web Link
https://n2v.almanacnews.com/square/print/2014/10/30/nro-publishes-explasive-expos-on-voter-fraud-in-north-carolina
Town Square
NRO Publishes Explosive Exposé on Voter Fraud in North Carolina
Original post made by Lincoln Steffens, another community, on Oct 30, 2014
For more please read the NRO article:
Web Link
Comments
Posted by Lincoln laughing, Lincoln crying
a resident of Menlo Park: Sharon Heights
on Oct 30, 2014 at 11:51 am
a resident of Menlo Park: Sharon Heights
on Oct 30, 2014 at 11:51 am
Explosive? Yup, exploding in laughter.
Hahahahaha. That's REALLY funy "explosive" evidence you've got there [portion removed].
from your explosively funny link: "So what guerrilla filmmaker James O’Keefe"
James O’Keefe, also known as:
Convicted felon, and habitual liar, James O’Keefe. Web Link "charged with entering federal property under false pretenses with the intent of committing a felony"
So sad, the hannity rushbo glenn beck crowd have to hide behind this. Zero evidence of voter fraud, but an "explosive" new study of an election that took place 6 years ago. There is no voter fraud, just election fraud, and voter suppression.
So sad.
NRO used to be a respected publication, but when you lean on o'keefe for "evidence" you are playing with criminals: Web Link
Posted by the Spakovsky Study cited
a resident of another community
on Oct 30, 2014 at 12:27 pm
a resident of another community
on Oct 30, 2014 at 12:27 pm
an "Explasive Exposé on Voter Fraud" that has no evidence, just a study on meta-data that's from the 2008 election. What a joke; or as Sam Clemens remided us: "there's 3 kinds of lies: lies, damn lies, and statistics."
The "Explasive Exposé" links back to a study by a fraud named Spakovsky. Here is an excerpt from a 2012 New Yorker profile of Spakovsky:
"Earlier this year, he noted, the Pew Center on the States found that more than 1.8 million people who had died were still registered to vote in America, and that 2.75 million people were registered to vote in multiple states. How many of these errors translate into fraudulent votes? “It is impossible to answer,” (Spakovsky) said. “We don’t have the tools in place.” But he cited a 2000 investigation, by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, of voting records in Georgia over the previous two decades; the paper reported that it had turned up fifty-four hundred instances of dead people being recorded as having voted. “That seems pretty substantial to me,” he said."
5,400 DEAD PEOPLE VOTED!!
5,400 DEAD PEOPLE VOTED!! it's fraud!
5,400 DEAD PEOPLE VOTED!! it's the Dems fault!
5,400 DEAD PEOPLE VOTED!! they're illegals voting!
5,400 DEAD PEOPLE VOTED!! we gotta DO sumthin'!
5,400 DEAD PEOPLE VOTED!! arrrgghhh!
5,400 DEAD PEOPLE VOTED!! Christ Almighty, we GOTTA DO SOMETHING!
OMG!
back to the article: "He did not mention that the article’s findings were later revised. The Journal-Constitution ran a follow-up article after the Georgia Secretary of State’s office indicated that the vast majority of the cases appeared to reflect clerical errors. Upon closer inspection, the paper admitted, its only specific example of a deceased voter casting a ballot didn’t hold up. The ballot of a living voter had been attributed to a dead man whose name was nearly identical."
5,400 DEAD PEOPLE VOTED!!
OMG!
Except.
They didn't vote. Matching names alone is fraught with peril. Double checking (removing "Jr's" from "Seniors" etc...) shows it didn't happen.
"Upon closer inspection, the paper admitted, its only specific example of a deceased voter casting a ballot didn’t hold up."
