Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, October 4, 2011, 8:49 AM
https://n2v.almanacnews.com/square/print/2011/10/04/portola-valley-council-neutral-on-alpine-trail
Town Square
Portola Valley council 'neutral' on Alpine trail
Original post made on Oct 4, 2011
Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, October 4, 2011, 8:49 AM
Comments
Posted by sidewalk
a resident of Portola Valley: other
on Oct 4, 2011 at 12:02 pm
a resident of Portola Valley: other
on Oct 4, 2011 at 12:02 pm
What the locals want is wider bike lanes and repaving the existing sidewalk. Can Stanford agree to that?
Posted by Barbara
a resident of Menlo Park: Stanford Weekend Acres
on Oct 4, 2011 at 2:38 pm
a resident of Menlo Park: Stanford Weekend Acres
on Oct 4, 2011 at 2:38 pm
As a former resident of Stanford Weekend Acres I understood that the trail was to off-set Stanford's new expanded facilities. The trail was originally proposed to be on Stanford land. If it were there, Ladera residents would be able to bike easily to a Stanford game with their child. Since no child bikes to school from Ladera or Stanford Weekend Acres it seems a bike path for recreation on Stanford property would be what is needed. The commuters to Stanford would also be able to avoid the Alpine congestion. Of course if the unspoken agenda is to widen Alpine Road to help the Stanford commuters in cars then the danger and inconvenience to individuals is not their concern.
Posted by Poster
a resident of another community
on Oct 4, 2011 at 3:51 pm
a resident of another community
on Oct 4, 2011 at 3:51 pm
There is another thread on this topic: Web Link
Posted by Name hidden
a resident of Atherton: West of Alameda
on Sep 25, 2017 at 1:53 pm
a resident of Atherton: West of Alameda
on Sep 25, 2017 at 1:53 pm
Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?
