The article states that at last Wed. council meeting Charles Marsala quickly recused himself from the council vote on this item and ran out of the room with out explanation.
While am pleased to see that council members with a conflict of interest are finally stepping aside to avoid endless ethics hearings-I am left with the following questions.
1) What exactly is Mr. Marsala's connection/conflict of interest with P.P.G.? Is it a financial relationship of some kind? Is it something recent or ongoing as has always seemed apparent?
and 2)
Why didn't Ms. Lewis offer to recuse herself as well, from voting on this same issue since her relationship to P.P.G. has been so recently well established by the town attorney's examination of the zoning violations on her property-built by P.P.G.
Also-I am curios to Know how we can ever learn the answer to these or any other questions the public might have of its leadership, if the city attorney is advising council members NOT to respond to public comment, as Ms Furth did at the last meeting on the subject of campaign financial disclosure.
Are we really expected to ask the city manager to address our concerns (see utubevidioMacgruber)??
Will the press at least, be allowed to expect answers on the public's behalf or has the peoples business become "nobody's business"?