News

More state questions delay Portola Valley from submitting latest draft housing plan

The groundbreaking for the Willow Commons housing project at 4388 Alpine Road in Portola Valley on June 14, 2023. The project is one of those included in the town's eight-year housing plan. Photo by Angela Swartz.

Just as Portola Valley was set to submit its latest draft of a housing plan ahead of this month's deadline, the state has brought up additional questions to the surprise and consternation of town leaders.

The state's request for Portola Valley to make further edits to the oft-revised document called the housing element is "super disappointing and frustrating," Mayor Sarah Wernikoff said during the Town Council meeting on Wednesday, Jan. 10.

"Given the size of our small town, the process has had an outsized impact on our overall operations, our staff and our budget," she said. "And having worked on the housing element for literally almost three years, I know we're a community that is working in good faith toward adoption and certification."

The council that night had expected to approve formally sending the town's revamped plan to the state Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) by the Jan. 31 cutoff. Last month, the town Planning Commission reviewed the updated housing element and recommended its submission to the state for final certification.

But on Monday, Jan. 8, HCD emailed Portola Valley that more changes are needed, putting the town's ability to make the state deadline in possible jeopardy.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

"Do they (HCD) acknowledge at all that they put us in this pickle?" Wernikoff asked.

'Do they (HCD) acknowledge at all that they put us in this pickle?'

-Sarah Wernikoff, mayor, Portola Valley

Vice Mayor Judith Hasko noted that the timing, in some ways, is "incredibly disappointing."

"But I guess if we had approved it tonight and then gotten that feedback, we'd be no better," she said.

Among the new feedback, HCD wants Portola Valley to strengthen land-use strategies for housing mobility, target additional community partnerships during the planning period and look to rezone areas throughout town to increase multifamily development opportunities.

Town staffers expected to meet with an HCD representative on Thursday, Jan. 11, to address all the issues that just came up.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

"It's a brand new set of changes that they're requesting that we sort of felt like we had the rug pulled up from under us," Jon Biggs, the town's interim planning and building director, told the council.

But the changes could be manageable enough to do in time to make the deadline.

"We're cautiously optimistic that these are not substantive changes," Biggs said. "Hopefully, we can get that wrapped up."

The town would then release the draft with the newest revisions for community members to go over and comment on, he said. It could still go back to the Planning Commission for another review if changes turn out to be more substantial than hoped before returning to the council.

The council is now scheduled to take up the matter again on Jan. 24, exactly a week before the deadline.

Most Viewed Stories

Most Viewed Stories

The state Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) program requires Portola Valley to plan for 253 new units during the current 2023-31 cycle compared to just 64 in the last eight-year period.

On Dec. 1, the town released its fourth attempt to get its plan certified after HCD kept sending back previous drafts for further work.

That fourth draft sought to resolve concerns HCD raised in July, including providing a zoning-density range of 20-23 units per acre for multifamily housing and boosting efforts to encourage the production of accessory dwelling units, or ADUs, should numbers start dropping below projections.

If the plan continues to fall short in the eyes of HCD, Portola Valley would remain subject to adverse consequences such as financial penalties and a state provision dubbed "builder's remedy" that allows developers to bypass local land-use rules to pursue their projects.

"Despite this week's setback, it's personally still my goal to try and get to adoption on January 31, so we can turn the page and focus our efforts and limited resources on actual implementation," Wernikoff said. "We're one year into our eight-year cycle at this point, and the clock is ticking."

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now

Follow on Twitter @almanacnews, Facebook and on Instagram @almanacnews for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Stay informed on important city government news. Sign up for our FREE daily Express newsletter.

More state questions delay Portola Valley from submitting latest draft housing plan

Just as Portola Valley was set to submit its latest draft of a housing plan ahead of this month's deadline, the state has brought up additional questions to the surprise and consternation of town leaders.

The state's request for Portola Valley to make further edits to the oft-revised document called the housing element is "super disappointing and frustrating," Mayor Sarah Wernikoff said during the Town Council meeting on Wednesday, Jan. 10.

"Given the size of our small town, the process has had an outsized impact on our overall operations, our staff and our budget," she said. "And having worked on the housing element for literally almost three years, I know we're a community that is working in good faith toward adoption and certification."

The council that night had expected to approve formally sending the town's revamped plan to the state Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) by the Jan. 31 cutoff. Last month, the town Planning Commission reviewed the updated housing element and recommended its submission to the state for final certification.

But on Monday, Jan. 8, HCD emailed Portola Valley that more changes are needed, putting the town's ability to make the state deadline in possible jeopardy.

"Do they (HCD) acknowledge at all that they put us in this pickle?" Wernikoff asked.

Vice Mayor Judith Hasko noted that the timing, in some ways, is "incredibly disappointing."

"But I guess if we had approved it tonight and then gotten that feedback, we'd be no better," she said.

Among the new feedback, HCD wants Portola Valley to strengthen land-use strategies for housing mobility, target additional community partnerships during the planning period and look to rezone areas throughout town to increase multifamily development opportunities.

Town staffers expected to meet with an HCD representative on Thursday, Jan. 11, to address all the issues that just came up.

"It's a brand new set of changes that they're requesting that we sort of felt like we had the rug pulled up from under us," Jon Biggs, the town's interim planning and building director, told the council.

But the changes could be manageable enough to do in time to make the deadline.

"We're cautiously optimistic that these are not substantive changes," Biggs said. "Hopefully, we can get that wrapped up."

The town would then release the draft with the newest revisions for community members to go over and comment on, he said. It could still go back to the Planning Commission for another review if changes turn out to be more substantial than hoped before returning to the council.

The council is now scheduled to take up the matter again on Jan. 24, exactly a week before the deadline.

The state Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) program requires Portola Valley to plan for 253 new units during the current 2023-31 cycle compared to just 64 in the last eight-year period.

On Dec. 1, the town released its fourth attempt to get its plan certified after HCD kept sending back previous drafts for further work.

That fourth draft sought to resolve concerns HCD raised in July, including providing a zoning-density range of 20-23 units per acre for multifamily housing and boosting efforts to encourage the production of accessory dwelling units, or ADUs, should numbers start dropping below projections.

If the plan continues to fall short in the eyes of HCD, Portola Valley would remain subject to adverse consequences such as financial penalties and a state provision dubbed "builder's remedy" that allows developers to bypass local land-use rules to pursue their projects.

"Despite this week's setback, it's personally still my goal to try and get to adoption on January 31, so we can turn the page and focus our efforts and limited resources on actual implementation," Wernikoff said. "We're one year into our eight-year cycle at this point, and the clock is ticking."

Comments

theater goer
Registered user
Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
on Jan 18, 2024 at 8:19 pm
theater goer, Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
Registered user
on Jan 18, 2024 at 8:19 pm

MI have followed the saga of PV’s current proposed housing element since its beginning nearly three years ago.
So much well-intentioned debate and detailed work has been expended for such a small town that I must now ask: Is HCD hoping we fail so that Portola Valley becomes subject to their “builder’s remedy”?
At this point, no other explanation appears to me to be reasonable.


PH
Registered user
Woodside: Emerald Hills
on Jan 19, 2024 at 11:59 am
PH, Woodside: Emerald Hills
Registered user
on Jan 19, 2024 at 11:59 am

PV is *already* subject to the "builder's remedy". That kicks in when cities don't have HCD-certified housing elements by a certain date that's already passed.





Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition.