A contentious bill that allows cities to enact zoning changes to enable construction of 10-unit housing developments in transit-rich and urban-infill areas cleared a critical hurdle Monday afternoon, when the state Assembly voted to approve it.
With a 44-12 vote, the Assembly gave a significant boost to Senate Bill 10, which was authored by state Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, and which had already cleared the state Senate. The Monday vote allows for a final "concurrence" vote by the Senate before the legislation heads to the governor.
The bill needed 41 votes to get through the Assembly. Assembly member Marc Berman, D-Menlo Park, was among the 44 legislators who voted in favor of the bill.
Along with SB 9, which would allow subdivisions in single-family zones, SB 10 has generated heated debate over the course of the legislative season. Housing advocates have characterized it as a critical step toward combatting "exclusionary zoning" and making it easier for cities to build much needed housing. Assembly member David Chiu, D-San Francisco, who introduced the bill on the Assembly floor, noted that the legislation allows cities to simply ignore it.
"If a city chooses to implement SB 10, this bill will provide that city with an inexpensive and effective tool to rezone parcels of up to 10 units," Chiu said. "If they choose not to implement SB 10, nothing will change."
Opponents of the bill, including citizen groups such as United Neighbors and Livable California, have criticized it as a major legislative overreach, particularly insomuch as it allows city councils to overrule zoning restrictions that had been enacted through citizen initiatives. Numerous cities, including Palo Alto, also have taken a position against the bill. Palo Alto's letter of opposition argued that the provision of the bill that allows governments to overrule citizen initiatives is one that "no Legislative branch of government should have, and which we — a City Council, and therefore such a branch — do not want."
"Such legislation echoes more of Russia than of California," the letter read.
While the majority of the Democrats in the Assembly voted in favor of the bill, opposition transcended party lines. Ten of the 12 Assembly members who voted against the bill — Rebecca Bauer-Kahan, Richard Bloom, Tasha Boerner Horva, Jim Frazier, Al Muratsuchi, Patrick O'Donnell, Adrin Nazarian, Cottie Petrie-Norris, Rudy Salas, and Mark Stone — are Democrats (Republicans Kelly Seyarto and Randy Voepel joined them in opposition).
In a statement immediately after the Assembly vote, Wiener called the bill "a step in the right direction."
"This voluntary tool will help local governments throughout California fundamentally reshape their zoning in infill areas, and help our state climb out of the housing crisis we face. Today is a step in the right direction, and we must continue to build on this victory to end California's housing crisis," Wiener said.
Editor's note: The story was updated to reflect the changing vote total.
Comments
Registered user
Atherton: other
on Aug 24, 2021 at 8:14 pm
Registered user
on Aug 24, 2021 at 8:14 pm
Marc Berman may rue the day he voted for this bill. The tide may be turning & and the Ultra Progressive programs that are changing the very nature of the Peninsula cities and towns are becoming unpopular. The majority of our current residents are becoming dismayed at the urbanization of the area. None of us moved here to live in a high density city and we should be taking a different view toward uncontrolled rapid growth.
Where is the vision for the nature of the different cities & towns on the Peninsula? Do all of them want to be like San Jose or San Francisco? Perhaps their is a role for smaller, less dense communities - BUT the State will not allow them to keep their very nature.
Registered user
Menlo Park: other
on Aug 24, 2021 at 9:30 pm
Registered user
on Aug 24, 2021 at 9:30 pm
I’m really glad to see SB10 moving along! It’s great to give our cities more options for tackling our housing crisis, which is an issue that affects us all in different ways. Although housing for the next generation may look a little different than it did for generations past, bills like SB10 will help us house our workforce, and get closer to the slightly more complete (at least from an economic perspective) communities we once had here before extreme gentrification took hold.
No matter where you are on the economic spectrum, it's better for us all as communities when those who work here (or grew up here, or are aging here, or are growing their families here...etc) can live here. Otherwise, we face hiring shortages, suffer the climate and traffic impacts of long commutes, and are deprived of the simple joy of seeing friendly faces from the community around town, as high costs force folks away. Let’s build a better future!
Registered user
Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Aug 24, 2021 at 9:57 pm
Registered user
on Aug 24, 2021 at 9:57 pm
Kudos to Berman for voting yes. Right side of history. I don't even understand why people are so upset about this bill, it only gives cities an optional tool.