News

School districts put tax measures on upcoming ballots

The exterior of Corte Madera School, where the Portola Valley School District office is located, in Portola Valley. School board members have voted to authorize the district to call for a parcel tax election in May 2021. The tax, if passed, would raise about $1 million for the district per year. Photo by Magali Gauthier.

There will be two tax parcel measures on local ballots this spring and next fall to maintain current educational programming and keep teacher salaries competitive. One measure is to fund the Portola Valley Elementary School District and the other is for the Menlo Park City School District.

During a Jan. 21 meeting, the Portola Valley district adopted a resolution to authorize the district to call for a parcel tax election in May 2021. It would generate approximately $1 million for the district annually. The cost of a special mail-in election is between $94,000 to $113,000, according to a Jan. 14 board agenda.

This comes on the heels of the failure of Measure P, a parcel tax renewal measure for the Portola Valley district, in March.

"To avoid significant instructional program reductions and to protect the academic excellence of our schools, the administration along with the parcel tax advisory committee recommends the renewal of the measure at a reduced amount (by $110) to $471 per parcel," according to a report prepared by staff for the Jan. 14 meeting. There would be no annual increase in the tax to adjust for inflation, said district Chief Business Officer Connie Ngo in an email.

The current tax, Measure O, funds advanced math, science and technology programs; reading and writing programs; art and music programs; reduced class sizes; and retention of teachers for the district's two schools, Ormondale and Corte Madera, according to the district website. Measure O, which expires on June 30, generates about $1.2 million for the district annually. District staff asserted that the measure "must be renewed" to maintain these programs.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

Measure O passed in 2013 with 69% of the vote. It consolidated two expiring measures: Measure C (with an annual tax of $290 per parcel) and Measure D ($168 per parcel), and increased the rate by $123 per parcel to $581, Ngo said.

During a Dec. 17 governing board meeting, trustees discussed the possible future role of the Portola Valley Schools Foundation. If the renewal fails, the district would have to rely more heavily on the foundation, trustees agreed.

Menlo Park City School District

Menlo Park City School District trustees voted to put the renewal of Measure X, its $360-per-parcel tax, on the November 2021 ballot. Photo by Michelle Le.

Further out, the Menlo Park City School District governing board voted last month to put the renewal of Measure X, its $360-per-parcel tax, on the November 2021 ballot. The district's governing board began looking at potential areas to cut costs by $1.5 million during the 2021-22 and 2022-23 school years, respectively, to help address deficit spending that could result from last 2019’s teacher salary hike (88% of the district’s 2020-21 budget will go toward staff salaries, according to the district).

"One of our primary responsibilities is that the district does not go bankrupt," said board President Sherwin Chen during a Dec. 17 meeting. "I think it is appropriate that we're super conservative as we model out a budget. The cost of being wrong is huge; that's layoffs and that's a cost we want to avoid at all costs."

(With declining enrollment, the district does have to layoff some staff this year, Superintendent Erik Burmeister said during the meeting. The district grew its staff this school year even with decreased enrollment because of the need for smaller class sizes during the COVID-19 pandemic.)

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

During the meeting, trustee David Ackerman said teacher salaries are the last place he is willing to make budget cuts

"I don't want our staff to have to carry the burden to get us through," he said.

Other trustees noted that the district can't take any potential cuts off the table.

In 2019, the board had preliminary discussions about putting a measure before voters to renew or replace 2017’s Measure X, which expires in 2024, at a higher taxation rate. It passed in 2017 with an initial annual rate of $360 per parcel.

Last week, the district began a process of determining the strategy and scope of a replacement parcel tax that will provide greater long-term financial solvency, according to a presentation prepared by staff for the Jan. 21 meeting.

Most Viewed Stories

Most Viewed Stories

At the Jan. 21 meeting, Burmeister recommended that the board pursue various ways to cut costs, which include:

● Elimination of the Director of Finance Position and creation of a new classified-level position

● Elimination of the directors of technology and human resources and the creation of one new combined position: Assistant Superintendent of Talent & Technology

● Agreement of the implementation of "combination classes" in those cases where doing so would save the need to hire another full time teacher at certain schools/grade levels and still maintain class size goals.

With implementation of a 5% raise for district teachers during the 2019-20 school year, the district's required reserve funds will drop below the minimum amount specified in board policy — at least 15% of total annual spending — by the 2022-23 school year (below 10%) without a higher level of tax revenue, according to the district.

Last February, the school board voted to hold off on placing a parcel tax measure on the November 2020 ballot.

According to a December presentation from Whitehurst/Mosher Campaign Strategy and Media, a political consulting firm hired to advise the district on the parcel tax, the November 2020 election showed that voters in San Mateo County and neighboring areas were supportive of local school measures at a high rate, despite the pandemic. All school bond measures and parcel taxes within San Mateo, Alameda and Marin Counties were approved. Some 70% of school bond measures and parcel taxes passed in Santa Clara County.

Both the Portola Valley and Menlo Park City school district measures would require two-thirds voter support to pass.

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now
Angela Swartz
 
Angela Swartz joined The Almanac in 2018 and covers education and small towns. She has a background covering education, city politics and business. Read more >>

Follow on Twitter @almanacnews, Facebook and on Instagram @almanacnews for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Stay informed on important education news. Sign up for our FREE daily Express newsletter.

School districts put tax measures on upcoming ballots

There will be two tax parcel measures on local ballots this spring and next fall to maintain current educational programming and keep teacher salaries competitive. One measure is to fund the Portola Valley Elementary School District and the other is for the Menlo Park City School District.

During a Jan. 21 meeting, the Portola Valley district adopted a resolution to authorize the district to call for a parcel tax election in May 2021. It would generate approximately $1 million for the district annually. The cost of a special mail-in election is between $94,000 to $113,000, according to a Jan. 14 board agenda.

This comes on the heels of the failure of Measure P, a parcel tax renewal measure for the Portola Valley district, in March.

"To avoid significant instructional program reductions and to protect the academic excellence of our schools, the administration along with the parcel tax advisory committee recommends the renewal of the measure at a reduced amount (by $110) to $471 per parcel," according to a report prepared by staff for the Jan. 14 meeting. There would be no annual increase in the tax to adjust for inflation, said district Chief Business Officer Connie Ngo in an email.

The current tax, Measure O, funds advanced math, science and technology programs; reading and writing programs; art and music programs; reduced class sizes; and retention of teachers for the district's two schools, Ormondale and Corte Madera, according to the district website. Measure O, which expires on June 30, generates about $1.2 million for the district annually. District staff asserted that the measure "must be renewed" to maintain these programs.

Measure O passed in 2013 with 69% of the vote. It consolidated two expiring measures: Measure C (with an annual tax of $290 per parcel) and Measure D ($168 per parcel), and increased the rate by $123 per parcel to $581, Ngo said.

During a Dec. 17 governing board meeting, trustees discussed the possible future role of the Portola Valley Schools Foundation. If the renewal fails, the district would have to rely more heavily on the foundation, trustees agreed.

Menlo Park City School District

Further out, the Menlo Park City School District governing board voted last month to put the renewal of Measure X, its $360-per-parcel tax, on the November 2021 ballot. The district's governing board began looking at potential areas to cut costs by $1.5 million during the 2021-22 and 2022-23 school years, respectively, to help address deficit spending that could result from last 2019’s teacher salary hike (88% of the district’s 2020-21 budget will go toward staff salaries, according to the district).

"One of our primary responsibilities is that the district does not go bankrupt," said board President Sherwin Chen during a Dec. 17 meeting. "I think it is appropriate that we're super conservative as we model out a budget. The cost of being wrong is huge; that's layoffs and that's a cost we want to avoid at all costs."

(With declining enrollment, the district does have to layoff some staff this year, Superintendent Erik Burmeister said during the meeting. The district grew its staff this school year even with decreased enrollment because of the need for smaller class sizes during the COVID-19 pandemic.)

During the meeting, trustee David Ackerman said teacher salaries are the last place he is willing to make budget cuts

"I don't want our staff to have to carry the burden to get us through," he said.

Other trustees noted that the district can't take any potential cuts off the table.

In 2019, the board had preliminary discussions about putting a measure before voters to renew or replace 2017’s Measure X, which expires in 2024, at a higher taxation rate. It passed in 2017 with an initial annual rate of $360 per parcel.

Last week, the district began a process of determining the strategy and scope of a replacement parcel tax that will provide greater long-term financial solvency, according to a presentation prepared by staff for the Jan. 21 meeting.

At the Jan. 21 meeting, Burmeister recommended that the board pursue various ways to cut costs, which include:

● Elimination of the Director of Finance Position and creation of a new classified-level position

● Elimination of the directors of technology and human resources and the creation of one new combined position: Assistant Superintendent of Talent & Technology

● Agreement of the implementation of "combination classes" in those cases where doing so would save the need to hire another full time teacher at certain schools/grade levels and still maintain class size goals.

With implementation of a 5% raise for district teachers during the 2019-20 school year, the district's required reserve funds will drop below the minimum amount specified in board policy — at least 15% of total annual spending — by the 2022-23 school year (below 10%) without a higher level of tax revenue, according to the district.

Last February, the school board voted to hold off on placing a parcel tax measure on the November 2020 ballot.

According to a December presentation from Whitehurst/Mosher Campaign Strategy and Media, a political consulting firm hired to advise the district on the parcel tax, the November 2020 election showed that voters in San Mateo County and neighboring areas were supportive of local school measures at a high rate, despite the pandemic. All school bond measures and parcel taxes within San Mateo, Alameda and Marin Counties were approved. Some 70% of school bond measures and parcel taxes passed in Santa Clara County.

Both the Portola Valley and Menlo Park City school district measures would require two-thirds voter support to pass.

Comments

Kay Blocker
Registered user
Portola Valley: Westridge
on Jan 29, 2021 at 12:22 pm
Kay Blocker, Portola Valley: Westridge
Registered user
on Jan 29, 2021 at 12:22 pm

I am forever in favor of supporting education. But this attempt is insulting. Where is the communication of plans for covid education? The schools have been closed for a year, generally education has been sub par for this year and we are supposed to impose new taxes. Cannot believe this. And we are supposed to forget the mismanagement that has occurred in the past.


Neighbor
Registered user
Portola Valley: other
on Jan 29, 2021 at 1:54 pm
Neighbor, Portola Valley: other
Registered user
on Jan 29, 2021 at 1:54 pm

No. Just No. We are sick of the incessant yearly ask from our local school systems, while they continue to propose and act upon senselessly expensive and inordinately excessive campus rebuilds. They have more money than God from the galas and million dollar donations from parents and community members, and yet they insist that this simply isn’t enough to provide quality education to our children (including music and the arts) while paying teaching staff appropriately. Where is all the money actually going? Please provide a detailed breakdown of expenses and a detailed monetary allocation for the PV School District. If a community with the wealth level of PV can’t maintain standards for a school district of a total of 700 kids, we need to know why.


Menlo Voter.
Registered user
Menlo Park: other
on Jan 29, 2021 at 3:39 pm
Menlo Voter., Menlo Park: other
Registered user
on Jan 29, 2021 at 3:39 pm

Yet again. As predictable as the sunrise, MPCSD comes asking for more money. Why? Enrollment is DOWN and going down. There needs to be significant justification if I'm going to vote for renewal of a parcel tax that probably shouldn't have been passed in the first place.


Erin
Registered user
Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
on Jan 29, 2021 at 4:43 pm
Erin, Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
Registered user
on Jan 29, 2021 at 4:43 pm

As a long-time PVSD parent of 3, I have been very happy with the thoughtful and cautious approach the school district has implemented to get our K-8 students back on campus this year. Kids have been on campus in a hybrid model since early in the fall. In fact, PVSD is 1 of only 8 out of the 23 public school districts in San Mateo County currently offering students on-campus schooling. It makes all the difference for my son to see his teachers and play (socially distanced and masked) with his friends at school.


Kay Blocker
Registered user
Portola Valley: Westridge
on Jan 29, 2021 at 11:40 pm
Kay Blocker, Portola Valley: Westridge
Registered user
on Jan 29, 2021 at 11:40 pm

@Erin,
Glad to hear from a parent with children in the schools and that you are happy with PV school plan. But I would like to see a breakdown as to where the money goes if I am to consider voting for this parcel tax. And what is supposed to happen after they graduate 8th grade....expensive private schools or our public high schools. Maybe that is where the money is truly needed.


Josh Moser
Registered user
Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
on Jan 31, 2021 at 3:14 pm
Josh Moser, Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
Registered user
on Jan 31, 2021 at 3:14 pm

The PV schools have been funded through the same 4 revenue sources for decades: 1) local property taxes 2) the parcel tax, 3) donations from parents and the community to the PV Schools Foundation, and 4) state and federal funds. California ranks below the national average in school funding—and only a fraction of local property taxes goes to our local schools. The current parcel tax is about to expire. This May, residents of the District are being asked to renew it, at a lower amount. The District’s leadership is fiscally responsible, and has made cuts wherever possible without jeopardizing the high caliber of student services. In fact, because of the District’s excellent financial stewardship, Standard & Poor assigned it an AA+ bond rating.
The bottom line, the quality of our schools, and ultimately our property values, will change if the District’s funding is reduced. Please join me in supporting the parcel tax renewal.


Kristin Brew
Registered user
Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
on Feb 1, 2021 at 6:12 am
Kristin Brew, Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
Registered user
on Feb 1, 2021 at 6:12 am

I would like the PVSD school district to explain why their costs keep rising as the number of students they serve keeps falling.


Connie Ngo
Registered user
Portola Valley: Portola Valley Ranch
on Feb 1, 2021 at 11:58 am
Connie Ngo, Portola Valley: Portola Valley Ranch
Registered user
on Feb 1, 2021 at 11:58 am

Please visit the PVSD website at Web Link to learn more about our District's finances, or contact Chief Business Official Connie Ngo directly at cngo@pvsd.net.


Brian
Registered user
Menlo Park: The Willows
on Feb 2, 2021 at 11:14 am
Brian, Menlo Park: The Willows
Registered user
on Feb 2, 2021 at 11:14 am

Menlo Park School District asks for money more often than the panhandlers that hang out by the stop lights. Every time I turn around they are asking for more money ($2000 per student at the beginning of the year, class donations, read-a-thons, auctions) and now they are yet again asking for another parcel tax. As Menlo Voter mentioned, enrollment has dropped over the last 10 years while the income from property taxes, the major source of funding, have skyrocketed (up about 10% each year). So less students, more income and they still want more. Maybe they should take a look at the current economy and be happy for what they have. Someone posted a great analysis about enrollment and revenues the last time this came up, I will have to see if I can find that and re-post it.


PV Resident
Registered user
Portola Valley: Portola Valley Ranch
on Feb 2, 2021 at 5:54 pm
PV Resident, Portola Valley: Portola Valley Ranch
Registered user
on Feb 2, 2021 at 5:54 pm

You can love our schools, our teachers and our Portola Valley community without greenlighting this spending. I'm fine with taxes but it's just too much, too many times.

The last Portola Valley vote will cost us $70-80 million for "upgrading" 2 schools with over a decade of declining enrollment. That's nearly $1.5 million per student served. The U.S. median spending for a new school construction is $60k/student served. Yes, it's more expensive in the bay area. Yes, it's more expensive with a small district. This is so far beyond that. If you thought it was excessive, now is your time to be heard.

In terms of annual operations, the CA average per student is 12k/year. Charters are 10k. PVSD is nearly 30k. I don't know the optimal number is to educate a child but in Portola Valley the answer is always "much, much more." We're all doing with less. For shrinking schools working with fewer students, less seems ok.


PV Resident
Registered user
Portola Valley: Portola Valley Ranch
on Feb 2, 2021 at 6:16 pm
PV Resident, Portola Valley: Portola Valley Ranch
Registered user
on Feb 2, 2021 at 6:16 pm

Correction: at $70-80 million, it's about 150k/student total cost for UPGRADES (not 1.5 million). The median NEW construction number for the U.S. is 50-60k/student.


ADavison
Registered user
Portola Valley: Westridge
on Feb 4, 2021 at 12:40 pm
ADavison, Portola Valley: Westridge
Registered user
on Feb 4, 2021 at 12:40 pm

We have been taxed up the wazoo recently, including the way over the top bond measure from a few years ago for a dwindling student body. How about lowering the amount even more and relying more heavily on the willing participants of foundation?


MPCSD Public Information Officer
Registered user
Menlo Park: Felton Gables
on Feb 8, 2021 at 9:44 am
MPCSD Public Information Officer, Menlo Park: Felton Gables
Registered user
on Feb 8, 2021 at 9:44 am

MPCSD Superintendent and Board Members invite members of the MPCSD community to attend an information session about district finances, including a replacement parcel tax for Measure X. We will host three sessions over Zoom: February 22 at 7:00 p.m., February 25 at 10:00 a.m., and February 27 at 9:30 a.m. More details and RSVP at district.mpcsd.org/engage. The district welcomes community input as it makes decisions about the long-term financial health of our schools.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition.