News

Google fined $22.5M for privacy 'misrepresentations'

Search giant charged with planting cookies on computers of Apple's Safari users

Google will be required to pay a $22.5 million penalty after the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) charged the Mountain View-based Internet search giant with misrepresenting its privacy settings to its users.

The privacy settlement, which according to the FTC is the largest penalty ever for violation of a commission order, came after a Stanford University graduate student uncovered the company's placement of "cookies" on users' computers even if they use Apple's Safari browser, which is set by default to block the cookies. Cookies are data that is stored in a browser that tracks users' online activities. They are often used by companies to send targeted ads to users.

In addition to the penalty, the FTC's order requires Google to "disable all tracking cookies it had said it would not place on consumers' computers," according to a commission statement.

Jonathan Mayer, the Stanford student who brought Google's cookie policy to light, wrote in a February post on his blog that Google and Vibrant Media (a company that specializes in display advertising) "intentionally circumvent Safari's privacy feature." He also provided on his blog a detailed technical analysis of Apple's Safari browser and the process Google followed for planting cookies despite the privacy features.

The FTC charged in its complaint that Google had been placing cookies on computers of Safari users for several months in 2011 and 2012, "although Google had previously told these users they would automatically be opted out of such tracking, as a result of the default setting of the Safari browser used in Macs, iPhones and iPads."

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

According to the FTC, Google's "misrepresentations" violated its October 2011 settlement with the FTC, which barred the company from "misrepresenting the extent to which consumers can exercise control over the collection of their information."

The commission issued a statement Thursday, Aug. 9, saying that its settlement "is intended to provide a strong message to Google and other companies under order that their actions will be under close scrutiny and that the Commission will respond to violations quickly and vigorously."

"No matter how big or small, all companies must abide by FTC orders against them and keep their privacy promises to consumers, or they will end up paying many times what it would have cost to comply in the first place," John Leibowitz, chairman of the FTC, said in a statement.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Gennady Sheyner
 
Gennady Sheyner covers the City Hall beat in Palo Alto as well as regional politics, with a special focus on housing and transportation. Before joining the Palo Alto Weekly/PaloAltoOnline.com in 2008, he covered breaking news and local politics for the Waterbury Republican-American, a daily newspaper in Connecticut. Read more >>

Follow on Twitter @almanacnews, Facebook and on Instagram @almanacnews for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Google fined $22.5M for privacy 'misrepresentations'

Search giant charged with planting cookies on computers of Apple's Safari users

Google will be required to pay a $22.5 million penalty after the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) charged the Mountain View-based Internet search giant with misrepresenting its privacy settings to its users.

The privacy settlement, which according to the FTC is the largest penalty ever for violation of a commission order, came after a Stanford University graduate student uncovered the company's placement of "cookies" on users' computers even if they use Apple's Safari browser, which is set by default to block the cookies. Cookies are data that is stored in a browser that tracks users' online activities. They are often used by companies to send targeted ads to users.

In addition to the penalty, the FTC's order requires Google to "disable all tracking cookies it had said it would not place on consumers' computers," according to a commission statement.

Jonathan Mayer, the Stanford student who brought Google's cookie policy to light, wrote in a February post on his blog that Google and Vibrant Media (a company that specializes in display advertising) "intentionally circumvent Safari's privacy feature." He also provided on his blog a detailed technical analysis of Apple's Safari browser and the process Google followed for planting cookies despite the privacy features.

The FTC charged in its complaint that Google had been placing cookies on computers of Safari users for several months in 2011 and 2012, "although Google had previously told these users they would automatically be opted out of such tracking, as a result of the default setting of the Safari browser used in Macs, iPhones and iPads."

According to the FTC, Google's "misrepresentations" violated its October 2011 settlement with the FTC, which barred the company from "misrepresenting the extent to which consumers can exercise control over the collection of their information."

The commission issued a statement Thursday, Aug. 9, saying that its settlement "is intended to provide a strong message to Google and other companies under order that their actions will be under close scrutiny and that the Commission will respond to violations quickly and vigorously."

"No matter how big or small, all companies must abide by FTC orders against them and keep their privacy promises to consumers, or they will end up paying many times what it would have cost to comply in the first place," John Leibowitz, chairman of the FTC, said in a statement.

Comments

Don
Menlo Park: Belle Haven
on Aug 10, 2012 at 9:45 am
Don, Menlo Park: Belle Haven
on Aug 10, 2012 at 9:45 am

None of that $22.5 million penalty pay out will go to the people who privacy was valuated. Once again Big Brother getting MILLIONS for nothing, while people privacy was a open book for GOOGLE.


Weismuller
another community
on Aug 10, 2012 at 11:20 am
Weismuller, another community
on Aug 10, 2012 at 11:20 am

What have you got to hide? Tax returns?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition.